tvolsfan
VN GURU
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2005
- Messages
- 39,252
- Likes
- 12,469
New Coaching Staff Uniforms
View attachment 39280
Lining Up For Practice
View attachment 39285
Preliminary Cheerleader outfits
View attachment 39282
:whistling:...Just Kidding
Thank you. I have read the article you linked to. Whatever influence Lyles had on the recruiting process, he denies steering recruits to any program:
Scout Will Lyles: Villain or victim? - College Football - Rivals.com
What else does that leave in regard to his involvement with Oregon's recruiting process? Driving coaches around and scheduling meetings.
I guess you didn't read where I directly addressed the hand written letters. They suggest that Oregon did not think that what Lyles was doing for them was outside of the rules. Given the gray area that the rules leave, it doesn't seem odd to me.
Again, you may be right. Might not turn out well. I just don't think it's as clear cut as you think.
But does it even matter? Oregon officials can no longer say with a straight face that Kelly's staff is doing things "the right way" when emails, phone records and a particularly damning handwritten note show how complicit they were in dealing with a man that allegedly did the following:
Concocted a plan for James, then a high-school senior in Texarkana, Texas, to transfer to an Arkansas school for his final semester to avoid taking a standardized state test required for college eligibility. Afterward, Lyles said Kelly (then Oregon's offensive coordinator) praised the scheme as "a great idea."
Served as Kelly's chaperone whenever he recruited in Houston, even arranging his high-school visits.
Arranged for and accompanied several prospective recruits (including Oregon signee Dontae Williams) on a 2009 visit to the USC-Oregon game. Kelly sent a handwritten note afterward telling him "thanks for orchestrating everything and all your help with these guys."
Contacted Oregon in January 2010, when it appeared Seastrunk's mother might not sign off on a letter of intent to Oregon, to find out how he could petition for a change of guardianship that would allow Seastrunk to substitute his grandmother's signature (which he did). Phone records show substantial contact between Lyles and Oregon staffers (including Kelly) during that time.
Read more: Chip Kelly clearly isn't doing things 'the right way' at Oregon - Stewart Mandel - SI.com
You guys may be right that the hammer is coming.
I'm not sure that it's as cut and dry as some of you think, though.
It's not against the rules to pay for helpful information from scouts. It's also not against the rules for a scout to give helpful information to athletes.
The area that could be a major violation is receiving help in the recruiting process. Lyles denies steering recruits for any program. The activities that could be seen as helping the recruiting process are "scheduling and driving coaches around to visits." However, if driving coaches around is a violation, wouldn't hiring a taxi during a recruiting trip also be a violation? What if a parent or even some random dude who happens to answer the phone at a recruits house schedules a HS meeting? Is that a violation also?
The rules don't make it very clear when an act goes from an ok service to one that is "part of" the recruiting process beyond what scouts are allowed to do.
Given Kelly's letter, Lyles appearing publicly with staff and recruits multiple times, etc. it suggests that Oregon thought it was working within the rules.
So, your idea is that he was a cheater by day, legit recruiting service by night? That's fanciful.
Can someone clarify where this ranks in terms of severity up against UNC's and tOSU's situations?
Posted via VolNation Mobile