I don't have a list - but am interested to see if any of what I was just told is true...
I'll quote the text I received: "Butch has lost major boosters. $10M buyout is not a problem. Needs to win out minus Alabama. If not, expect word after LSU game."
Again I have no inside knowledge personally. But this guy is a friend and has been right on several other instances pertaining to UT athletics (mainly basketball).
I'm hoping some better-connected folks can either refute or confirm.
I will believe this when I see it.
There is no way that Butch is going 10-2 in any rational universe. But, I sincerely doubt he is fired after the LSU game if he is sitting at 8-3 or maybe even 7-4.
You arm chair ADs and wannabe booster have NO IDEA how this works. If you did you would not waste your time posting such nonsense.
The mega rich boosters do not micro manage the UTAD. They are big picture guys; its how they got where they are in life. Fact is, UT has a brand new AD who will be allowed to do his job. Barring a collapse or scandal, BJ is coach here next year. By the way a collapse is not 8-4.
You arm chair ADs and wannabe booster have NO IDEA how this works. If you did you would not waste your time posting such nonsense.
The mega rich boosters do not micro manage the UTAD. They are big picture guys; its how they got where they are in life. Fact is, UT has a brand new AD who will be allowed to do his job. Barring a collapse or scandal, BJ is coach here next year. By the way a collapse is not 8-4.
Thunder is not as favorable toward the University as he once was or used to be. Haslam is really really tight with his money now. He's got real world stuff going on now.
None of them are going to give $10 mil to a coach just to leave! Ludicris
I'd say this is more than likely the case. They're not going to bail them out on their bad coaching hires. I don't blame them, they keep doing it. It's like rewarding a kid for failure.The stands will have to empty out and likely will with awesome Butch at the controls. Only thing they listen to is loss of revenue.Thunder is not as favorable toward the University as he once was or used to be. Haslam is really really tight with his money now. He's got real world stuff going on now.
None of them are going to give $10 mil to a coach just to leave! Ludicris
#FakeNews #AlternativeFacts
I don't have a list - but am interested to see if any of what I was just told is true...
I'll quote the text I received: "Butch has lost major boosters. $10M buyout is not a problem. Needs to win out minus Alabama. If not, expect word after LSU game."
Again I have no inside knowledge personally. But this guy is a friend and has been right on several other instances pertaining to UT athletics (mainly basketball).
I'm hoping some better-connected folks can either refute or confirm.
I don't have a list - but am interested to see if any of what I was just told is true...
I'll quote the text I received: "Butch has lost major boosters. $10M buyout is not a problem. Needs to win out minus Alabama. If not, expect word after LSU game."
Again I have no inside knowledge personally. But this guy is a friend and has been right on several other instances pertaining to UT athletics (mainly basketball).
I'm hoping some better-connected folks can either refute or confirm.
We have a billionaire booster. It's not about money. He gets what he wants when he wants it.
2012 Home Attendance (DD last season):
87,821
102,455
81,719
102,455
84,189
89,272
81,841
Last Year (Butch BIG Year):
100,074
101,362
102,455
102,455
98,343
101,075
101,012
These numbers will sharply decline this season, and the rest will be history.
That's my whole point. Something isn't right. If these guys really invested any real money into this program anymore we wouldn't have had Dooley or Butch. That's bad return on a investment and that's how they look at it. So either the UTAD has alienated a bunch of folks or they never really gave big money to begin with.First, buyout isn't 10 million at the end of season...
Second, if it's not about money how did we end up with Dooley and Butch in the first place?