Opposite here. I'm more hyped now, especially after hearing from some of the folks who have played it. Beautiful environment, great movement system, and an intriguing single player story with co-op elements. The fact that they said it's not an MMO surprised me in a good way. They clearly want this to be more like a story driven co-op game. I'm thinking more along the lines of Far Cry 5. But they also said they want the world to build over years to come. I'm excited to see more.
Opposite here. I'm more hyped now, especially after hearing from some of the folks who have played it. Beautiful environment, great movement system, and an intriguing single player story with co-op elements. The fact that they said it's not an MMO surprised me in a good way. They clearly want this to be more like a story driven co-op game. I'm thinking more along the lines of Far Cry 5. But they also said they want the world to build over years to come. I'm excited to see more.
Opposite here. I'm more hyped now, especially after hearing from some of the folks who have played it. Beautiful environment, great movement system, and an intriguing single player story with co-op elements. The fact that they said it's not an MMO surprised me in a good way. They clearly want this to be more like a story driven co-op game. I'm thinking more along the lines of Far Cry 5. But they also said they want the world to build over years to come. I'm excited to see more.
I hope you're right. Maybe it was just the way they presented it but last year's unveil was way more exciting. Also, I have ZERO faith that this game will be ready by February. I think they just said that to make investors think it's still coming fiscal 2018 and not hurt their stock. I wouldn't be surprised if this game gets pushed back.
I hope they consider having some sort of multiplayer in the future after they have a great base established.I played the closed demo in December. The actual game was better than I anticipated. But, what we played was very short and did not have the loot system up and running. Hard to tell how the game would ultimately be from that little taste.
I wish it was more shared open world and you didn't live inside your own world.
I'm looking forward to seeing how it turns out.
people are getting tired of the open world/large crowd games. I think its mostly because most don't have good game play or story, and need the multiplayer aspect to hide the other defects.I played the closed demo in December. The actual game was better than I anticipated. But, what we played was very short and did not have the loot system up and running. Hard to tell how the game would ultimately be from that little taste.
I wish it was more shared open world and you didn't live inside your own world.
I'm looking forward to seeing how it turns out.
not necessarily the open world stuff, more anything MMO esque, which now tends to be pretty open world now. Thousands miles wide and one mile deep gets real old real fast.I don’t know if “people” are getting tired op open world games. What makes you say that?
You have some fair points, but the reasons mass effect and fallout were awful had nothing to do with online and everything to do with poor management and absolutely no quality assurance as far as limiting the bugs that both of those games were riddled with. Online PVP and PVE games are very popular and they aren’t going away. Story single player games have a place too, we can have bothnot necessarily the open world stuff, more anything MMO esque, which now tends to be pretty open world now. Thousands miles wide and one mile deep gets real old real fast.
the quiet majority of gamers, imo, are looking for something with more to it, which a lot games don't deliver anymore. for God's sake they messed up Mass Effect. Mass Effect! now it looks like Fallout is also going down the same drain trying to bring in multiplayer as the focus. Halo has already lost its edge a couple games ago. Most of my gamer friends don't do pretty much any PVP. We want a game that 10 years from now we still want to play. COD/fortnight/whatever the next game is has no lasting value once the next thing comes out. none. Its bad when racing games are starting to challenge shooters and rpgs on the story front. (thats a quote from a friend, I don't do racing games so I don't know what he is talking about)
I think its why you see RDR2 getting such acclaim. It starts with the single player experience, and they are working in PVP. but it stands on its own as a single player. if you want an impact game thats the way you have to go imo. or at worst rely on the coop aspect like Anthem*pending*. read in an article about Fallout 76 "Nothing ruins a game like another a**hole running around in yours"
that's what happens when you try to do everything and step outside yourself. it also limits, or sets the direction of your development.You have some fair points, but the reasons mass effect and fallout were awful had nothing to do with online and everything to do with poor management and absolutely no quality assurance as far as limiting the bugs that both of those games were riddled with. Online PVP and PVE games are very popular and they aren’t going away. Story single player games have a place too, we can have both
the newest COD is huge. how many people playing old COD? how many people go back and play those old games? its the social media culture with the multiplayer games.you don’t think call of duty or other pvp games don’t have a faithful following? Cod isn’t huge like it is because of the single player experience.