BadJerry20
Internet Super Hero
- Joined
- Mar 29, 2012
- Messages
- 65,904
- Likes
- 8,574
... his shooting selection wasnt ideal and it was obvious that he depends too much on his dominant (left) hand. He is by far a better athlete than a basketball player at the moment, but the truth is that he showed real promise and he can become an excellent 3 and D player in the future
... His shooting isn't very good, but he's a lock down defender, that is explosive at getting to the rim.
Good luck finding anyone of his stature at his age.
IMHO Pons is a project, comparable to Jonathan Kongbo in football. Physically dominant at the previous level, but lacking experience/game IQ. That doesn't mean he isn't a worthwhile project, but I don't see him making immediate contribution without some serious development.
Shut down defender--is that only in man-to-man? With all the advantages Pons possesses at the U17 level, he's only averaging 13 minutes. Does that indicate he can only be used in certain situations, maybe when the team is running a simple defense? That's a project.
Think how many defensive variations, how many situational switches, Tennessee runs in a half, let alone a season. How much will Pons have to learn to become interchangeable coming off the bench? We don't have the surrounding talent to "simplify" our game to make minutes for Pons. Barnes has got to be convinced he and teammates can teach Pons what he needs to know in the off-season. That's a project.
Regarding what he can learn in the off-season from teammates... does Pons understand English? Will he be assigned a French translator, 24/7 ? The language barrier certainly won't speed up his development.
Given his height, he's pretty well topped out on physical development. The advantages he brings physically will be less at the next level. Each year he's not going to be another year further developed in college. At the next level, physicality is only an advantage if you put yourself in the right position (acceptable to referees). The difference between physical play and drawing fouls is subtle. Does he have that part of basketball IQ?
Everything that keeps him on the bench for 27 minutes a game at the U17 level keeps him on the bench for how long at the collegiate level? All those things make him a project, IMHO.
Now is he a worthwhile project? That's for the coaches to decide, as they evaluate what it will take to unleash his upside. And do it in French.
They have Alexander to translate.IMHO Pons is a project, comparable to Jonathan Kongbo in football. Physically dominant at the previous level, but lacking experience/game IQ. That doesn't mean he isn't a worthwhile project, but I don't see him making immediate contribution without some serious development.
Shut down defender--is that only in man-to-man? With all the advantages Pons possesses at the U17 level, he's only averaging 13 minutes. Does that indicate he can only be used in certain situations, maybe when the team is running a simple defense? That's a project.
Think how many defensive variations, how many situational switches, Tennessee runs in a half, let alone a season. How much will Pons have to learn to become interchangeable coming off the bench? We don't have the surrounding talent to "simplify" our game to make minutes for Pons. Barnes has got to be convinced he and teammates can teach Pons what he needs to know in the off-season. That's a project.
Regarding what he can learn in the off-season from teammates... does Pons understand English? Will he be assigned a French translator, 24/7 ? The language barrier certainly won't speed up his development.
Given his height, he's pretty well topped out on physical development. The advantages he brings physically will be less at the next level. Each year he's not going to be another year further developed in college. At the next level, physicality is only an advantage if you put yourself in the right position (acceptable to referees). The difference between physical play and drawing fouls is subtle. Does he have that part of basketball IQ?
Everything that keeps him on the bench for 27 minutes a game at the U17 level keeps him on the bench for how long at the collegiate level? All those things make him a project, IMHO.
Now is he a worthwhile project? That's for the coaches to decide, as they evaluate what it will take to unleash his upside. And do it in French.
30% from 3 is worse than Derek Reese's 3pt percentage FYI and remember how many people complained about Reese shooting 3s? Lots.You have no idea why he plays that much. He does have a player on his team on the wing who is considered a top NBA prospect. Maybe the coach didn't like playing them together. He still averages 11 in only 13 minutes. His per 40 averages are great. He shot 30% from 3 so he has the ability. He also was the most athletically gifted player at an event with several future pros. He won't be a project on the college level.
30% from 3 is worse than Derek Reese's 3pt percentage FYI and remember how many people complained about Reese shooting 3s? Lots.