Most lopsided debate ever?

[volmaverick]

Think I heard someone on MSNBC say just that

 

[volinbham]

overstated.

 

[volmaverick]

DU is in melt down made

 

[Gramps]

2 others stand out.

Kennedy- Nixon in 1960

Bush- Clinton in 1992

This one is up there.

 

[DC_Vol]

DU is in melt down made

haha - this is probably spot on. My girlfriend went there. Impressed you knew University of Denver = DU.

 

[WesternKyVol]

2 others stand out.

Kennedy- Nixon in 1960

Bush- Clinton in 1992

This one is up there.

Reagan-Carter.

 

[steino]

Anyone remember the Bush/Dukakis debates in '88?

 

[orangesparkles]

It's lopsided until, you know, you actually read into what Romney said.

 

[Elhanan]

Not sure if it was the most lop sided ever but it got ugly fast.

I couldn't believe how much Romney dominated that debate.

 

[WesternKyVol]

overstated.

Indeed. And I'm a republican. Most of Romney's best moments came late after the regular people got bored.

 

[Elhanan]

Reagan-Carter.

This. :good!:

 

[Cartervol]

That was a mauling by definition.... They're still mopping up Obama blood...

 

[Gramps]

Anyone remember the Bush/Dukakis debates in '88?

I don't recall anything about those debates that stand out.

 

[Elhanan]

That was a mauling by definition.... They're still mopping up Obama blood...

lol

 

[DC_Vol]

It's lopsided until, you know, you actually read into what Romney said.

This is how I feel about the Obama administration.

I guess Obama does, too. It's an awful indication when you keep referencing what your plan is when you're the sitting president.

S**t or get off the pot. Obama never sat down.

 

[volmaverick]

Not since Jimmy Carter faced Ronald Reagan has the U.S. presidency been so embarrassingly represented in public. Actually, that’s an insult to Jimmy Carter.

Read more: HURT: Obama the debater: Making Jimmy Carter look awesome - Washington Times HURT: Obama the debater: Making Jimmy Carter look awesome - Washington Times
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter

 

[Gramps]

Reagan-Carter.

You are correct.

 

[GoBigOrangeVols]

This was a Roman Triumph.

 

[tumscalcium]

It's lopsided until, you know, you actually read into what Romney said.

Explain.

 

[steino]

I don't recall anything about those debates that stand out.

I was kidding. Only thing I remember was "Joe Isuzu".

 

[Bezdomny]

This is how I feel about the Obama administration.

I guess Obama does, too. It's an awful indication when you keep referencing what your plan is when you're the sitting president.

S**t or get off the pot. Obama never sat down.

Spot-on.

 

[volinbham]

It's lopsided until, you know, you actually read into what Romney said.

Oh wonderful - another mind reader. You and LG hang out much?

Have you bothered to read into what Obama said?

 

[volinbham]

the crazy thing with the media (all talk of bias aside) is that if Mitt doesn't crush Obama in the next one the narrative will be about the amazing Obama comeback.

I'm depressed.

 

[Cartervol]

the crazy thing with the media (all talk of bias aside) is that if Mitt doesn't crush Obama in the next one the narrative will be about the amazing Obama comeback.

I'm depressed.

Depends on the questions asked... He just can't run and hide from his record. So they'll have to ask questions about something else.....

Who is the next moderator?

 

[volinbham]

Depends on the questions asked... He just can't run and hide from his record. So they'll have to ask questions about something else.....

Who is the next moderator?

I guess I'm just commenting on how the media needs to exaggerate a story. If it's a draw it will be all about how Obama made an amazing comeback. If Romney wins again it will be all about what is wrong with Obama. If Obama wins it will be all about how the first one was a fluke.

The whole need to fill 24 hours of news stuff has created a monster.