VolsNSkinsFan
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 4, 2007
- Messages
- 15,798
- Likes
- 3,956
So basically, what you're saying is that after getting knocked over the table, the guy should have got up and shot the guy dead and claim self-defense. But by passing on his option to defend himself with deadly force, that option now goes to the guy that started the fight.
Not hardly the way the law works.
What?? I haven't the slightest idea how you got that from what I wrote. In fact it's the antithesis. I'm kind of bewildered actually. Please read again the reaction of the person I described as being knocked over the table, their reaction and what the consequences could be.
In the example you gave, if the guy that got knocked over the table said he feared for is life then couldn't he then justify using deadly force?
If the other person was not actively pressing an attack? No. If the other guy followed him to the ground over the table and continued to whale away on him then quite possibly.
My point was even if someone else "starts" something if you can't manage a articulable and reasonable justification for deadly force then you've overstepped your bounds.
Let me ask you something; I read somewhere that a 911 call came in about the Zimmerman incident where it sounded like Martin was on top of Zimmerman and the latter was calling for help. If ballistic evidence demonstrates a scenario where a bullet was fired consistent with Martin being on top of Zimmerman while the latter was on the ground in a defensive position how do you think that would look in court? How much would that change your view of the case? (These are the kinds of questions we don't have answers to that really need answering)
If the other person was not actively pressing an attack? No. If the other guy followed him to the ground over the table and continued to whale away on him then quite possibly.
My point was even if someone else "starts" something if you can't manage a articulable and reasonable justification for deadly force then you've overstepped your bounds.
Let me ask you something; I read somewhere that a 911 call came in about the Zimmerman incident where it sounded like Martin was on top of Zimmerman and the latter was calling for help. If ballistic evidence demonstrates a scenario where a bullet was fired consistent with Martin being on top of Zimmerman while the latter was on the ground in a defensive position how do you think that would look in court? How much would that change your view of the case? (These are the kinds of questions we don't have answers to that really need answering)
a chick named Jonatha Carr went ballistic yesterday... Just google her name and turn the volume down
That's my point. Now we're trying to decipher whether the dead guy was moving forward, walking away, acting in a threatening manner...
At the very least, you bring the shooter in for questioning so that you can get an official statement on record. Check to see if alcohol was involved. Not allow the shooter to go home and spend weeks getting a story together.
Are you saying Zimmerman never made an official statement to the police? This may be the case but I find that hard to believe. As for being arrested and detained that's iffy. It was determined at the scene there wasn't evidence sufficient to warrant that. You can disagree but that was the case.
As to the 911 calls, they state that they heard "someone" screaming for help. The only one who said that they heard Zimmerman screaming for help has stated that when being questioned by the police she initially stated that she heard Martin screaming for help, but the officer corrected her and told her it was Zimmerman calling for help. Take that for what it's worth. At the very least, Zimmerman should have been required to come in and make a statement.
Man shot and killed in neighborhood altercation
I also find it hard to believe that an unarmed 140lb 17yo kid can cause a 240lb 28yo man to believe his life is in danger to the degree that deadly force is necessary. In your scenario, you at least put a weapon in the guy's hand.
Glenn Beck's website discusses it. As usual, this is disgusting.
Beck's Website Calls Trayvon Martin "The Aggressor" | Mother Jones
Great link, as silly as becks
More protests happening today, Al Sharpton in the area...
Al Sharpton to join protest over killing of unarmed Florida teen - CNN.com
Note some of the witness statements in this article.
"The time that we heard the whining and then the gunshot, we did not hear any wrestling, no punching, no fighting, nothing to make it sound like there was a fight," said Mary Cutcher, one of the callers.
Moments later, several neighbors called the emergency number to report a commotion outside.
The 911 tapes, released by police, revealed that while some neighbors were on the phone with emergency dispatchers, cries for help followed by a gunshot sounded in the background.
Another caller, Selma Mora Lamilla, said she did not hear any altercation, but the teen cried and "whimpered" before the shooting.
Glenn Beck's website discusses it. As usual, this is disgusting.
Beck's Website Calls Trayvon Martin "The Aggressor" | Mother Jones
Glenn Beck's website discusses it. As usual, this is disgusting.
Beck's Website Calls Trayvon Martin "The Aggressor" | Mother Jones
this happened around the same time this trayvon stuff did, but has been completely ignored by the media.
Brutal home invasion of Oklahoma couple ends their 65-year romance after first meeting on a blind date | Mail Online
Probably due to the fact that the person responsible in that horrific case was arrested immediately. Meanwhile, Zimmerman remains a free man.