SamRebel35
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2009
- Messages
- 15,331
- Likes
- 12,171
What is this? It looks like a spewing waterfall of molten steel.
View attachment 171640
Why do you think this is molten steel?
Seems like steel would be among the last things to suspect given its high melting point. The plane was presumably mostly made of aluminum, which melts at a lower temperature. It could also be another metal, such as copper from pipe or wire. Hell, maybe it's not even metal at all.I've been trying to come up with what else it could be. The way in which it appears to be spewing or gushing is weird. And keep in mind the perspective. Each window is 10 to twelve feet. That means the cascading portion of red molten looking material is 50 to 60 feet long. Just bizarre to see.
7.2 b $ for Silverman but i think he only cleared 3.6b because the court agreed it was only 1 attack.
Here is my question for all of the 9/11 conspiracy theorists... Why bring the buildings down? We would have had the same response to two 747s that terrorists hijacked and crashed in to the WTC.
For more government control. What better way to scare the public into passing new unconstitutional laws and gaining unlimited power?Here is my question for all of the 9/11 conspiracy theorists... Why bring the buildings down? We would have had the same response to two 747s that terrorists hijacked and crashed in to the WTC.
Devil's advocate here, but with the mysterious way in which wtc 7 imploded under strange conditions, maybe the intent was to create a plausible scenario in which to destroy building 7 and make it look like collateral damage. CIA and Secret Service were tenenats in that building. May be a convenient way to dispose of records that were problematic. Devil's advocate. I don't believe that to be the case, but stranger things...
If you look at the close proximity of the north tower in relation to building 7, the collapse tends to make more sense.
View attachment 171676