BigOrangeTrain
Morior Invictus
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2013
- Messages
- 72,615
- Likes
- 81,696
So EL, you claim to be a lawyer, please defend this.
He said that "he had no knowledge of what did or didn't happen" in that house and that he wasn't implying that Garrett was guilty of anything. He was just saying that she may have the two confused. I tend to agree that is a possible conclusion based on what he stated, as far as the house location, floorplan, etc..Ed might be in big trouble.
He said that "he had no knowledge of what did or didn't happen" in that house and that he wasn't implying that Garrett was guilty of anything. He was just saying that she may have the two confused. I tend to agree that is a possible conclusion based on what he stated, as far as the house location, floorplan, etc..
I love that the Democrats are still running with the “why isn’t Kavanaugh requesting an FBI investigation like Dr Ford” line. Uh, why would he request an investigation?
I think this is an incredibly bad idea. Not a good look to mansplain to a woman that she is misremembering and that the old white men in the room have better access to the facts than the victim.
Screw that mansplaining BS liberal label. One of the 11 republican white men needs to go full bore and hammer questions at her. All this playing around with kid gloves is BS. You want another Tea party? Because this is how you get another tea party.