We haven't had an A.D. since Dickey who gets his phone calls returned from the kind of coaches anybody wants. I'll admit that Hart is smarter than Hamilton. That's the good news. The bad news is that being smarter than Mike Hamilton doesn't get him out of the imbecile range.
Because this job combines high expectations with high obstacles to meeting those expectations. TV contracts and modern college football allow a lot of programs to offer competitive contracts, so our edge there is minimal, and even if it were more, it would be a high-risk job for the smart candidate. Here is why:
1. The number 1 factor in winning is talent better than your schedule;
2. The number 1 factor in recruiting talent is a local talent base with loyalty to your football brand;
3. 9 of our competitors in the SEC have better local talent bases than we do, including Florida, Georgia, South Carolina, Alabama, Auburn, LSU, Texas A&M, Ole Miss, Miss. State, and 2 are close/comparable in Arkansas & Missouri;
4. This means that if we hire a coach as good as those programs, we should still lose 5 to 6 games each year, due to their built-in local talent base competitive advantage;
5. Our program fired a coach who had, for only the 2nd time in his 16+ year career, lost 6 games in a season, a coach who was a HOF local who had appeared in the SEC title game the year before and won a national title for the program, a fan base who believes we should be "SEC title or bust" in our expectations, should beat our much-more-local-talent rivals Florida, Alabama and Georgia each year, and find 8-win-a-season contracts a "joke."
Given that the modern SEC features good coaches throughout, a coach to meet UT fan expectations would have to achieve what no coach has achieved anywhere -- out-recruit good recruiters for their local talent and out-coach more talented teams on a consistent, exceptional basis. That is why only an idiot (or a big-hat-and-no-cattle kind of coach, exactly the kind we have hired 3 times in a row when the better coaches all turned us down) would ever jump to take the Tennessee job. Fan delusions about the reality of where we stand in the college football landscape (lack-of-local-talent-base in a brutal-SEC-schedule with fans expecting titles-or-bust) is why we are here.
Where is this lots of cash that you speak of our revenues are 107 million and expenses are 106 million..remember football pays for all other sports except mens bball, We also had to cancel some projects because of lack of money
Here is the full list
NCAA | Finances | USA TODAY Sports
I also see we have a larger athletic budget than Georgia, , Florida State, Michigan State, UCLA, Ole Miss, Clemson, Mississippi State to name a few schools that are having more success than us right now.
Long run it would be cheaper to pay 5-6 million a year instead of all these buyouts. If you buy a crappy reject tv at Bigs Lots for $179.00 and Sears got a nice Samsung for $499.00. The Samsung TV will probably get more years, quality and features with the Samsung. The Big Lots TV will have no good features, quality of sound and pictures is below average and TV will probably last 2 years while Samsung will last 8-10 years. Please Tennessee next time lets don't get a Big Lots quality type Head Coach and staff.Too damn broke to shell out the big coin. Can't get a big time coach on the cheap, but you get what you pay for.
Because this job combines high expectations with high obstacles to meeting those expectations. TV contracts and modern college football allow a lot of programs to offer competitive contracts, so our edge there is minimal, and even if it were more, it would be a high-risk job for the smart candidate. Here is why:
1. The number 1 factor in winning is talent better than your schedule;
2. The number 1 factor in recruiting talent is a local talent base with loyalty to your football brand;
3. 9 of our competitors in the SEC have better local talent bases than we do, including Florida, Georgia, South Carolina, Alabama, Auburn, LSU, Texas A&M, Ole Miss, Miss. State, and 2 are close/comparable in Arkansas & Missouri;
4. This means that if we hire a coach as good as those programs, we should still lose 5 to 6 games each year, due to their built-in local talent base competitive advantage;
5. Our program fired a coach who had, for only the 2nd time in his 16+ year career, lost 6 games in a season, a coach who was a HOF local who had appeared in the SEC title game the year before and won a national title for the program, a fan base who believes we should be "SEC title or bust" in our expectations, should beat our much-more-local-talent rivals Florida, Alabama and Georgia each year, and find 8-win-a-season contracts a "joke."
Given that the modern SEC features good coaches throughout, a coach to meet UT fan expectations would have to achieve what no coach has achieved anywhere -- out-recruit good recruiters for their local talent and out-coach more talented teams on a consistent, exceptional basis. That is why only an idiot (or a big-hat-and-no-cattle kind of coach, exactly the kind we have hired 3 times in a row when the better coaches all turned us down) would ever jump to take the Tennessee job. Fan delusions about the reality of where we stand in the college football landscape (lack-of-local-talent-base in a brutal-SEC-schedule with fans expecting titles-or-bust) is why we are here.
We are freagin UT!!!! We are a historic program with lots of cash. Is there still a reason why no good coaches come here? They all pass up on us. I want the truth!!!
After what was done to Fulmer, UT has little respect within the coaching community. It will serve as a "project" for those attempting to bridge into a major program for the forseeable future.