Zone Election Thread

I'd prefer a system that can't crown the one with less votes as winner.

Here's the presidents where that didn't occur. If It happened tonight either way you'd have two relatively recently buy otherwise very few.

John Quincy Adams who lost by 44,804 votes to Andrew Jackson in 1824
Rutherford B. Hayes who lost by 264,292 votes to Samuel J. Tilden in 1876
Benjamin Harrison who lost by 95,713 votes to Grover Cleveland in 1888
George W. Bush who lost by 543,816 votes to Al Gore in the 2000 election.
 
Here's the presidents where that didn't occur. If It happened tonight either way you'd have two relatively recently buy otherwise very few.

John Quincy Adams who lost by 44,804 votes to Andrew Jackson in 1824
Rutherford B. Hayes who lost by 264,292 votes to Samuel J. Tilden in 1876
Benjamin Harrison who lost by 95,713 votes to Grover Cleveland in 1888
George W. Bush who lost by 543,816 votes to Al Gore in the 2000 election.

Romney will win by 1.5 million votes and lose
 
95EEEE6ACC31A4E64C0FE7586B9BA_h316_w628_m4_cOFqAfXDT.jpg
 
TBH as a white male the Republicans have gotten too focused on gays, Mexicans, and of all things rape abortions.

Seriously does that shizz matter even one iota as much as economy and defecit. Need more moderate republicans IMO.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Why do these independent ritards run and get 10-12k votes for the presidency. To say they did it? To waste time and money? Makes no sense.
 
TBH as a white male the Republicans have gotten too focused on gays, Mexicans, and of all things rape abortions.

Seriously does that shizz matter even one iota as much as economy and defecit. Need more moderate republicans IMO.

Uh oh.



RIP DD
 

Advertisement



Back
Top