Zimmerman Trial

#2,701
#2,701
Lol there are people on Twitter getting trolled hard by an account called @911Buff saying there is massive riots in Dallas, Miami, Chicago, etc.
 
#2,702
#2,702
lawgator1 said:
What the...
Click to expand...

If you haven't noticed, your party isn't having a good year, and your headline supporters like Alec Baldwin, a host of other celebrity types, politicians and journalists are showing their azz out their tonight

Let me give you a heads up. Next year isn't going to get better either
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#2,704
#2,704
kah*leed ‏@KhalidFields 1m
Situations like the #ZimmermanTrial call for us to hold an economic boycott. No one spends money like Black folk and America thrives on $...
 
#2,705
#2,705
Vol4LifeLCA said:
So derived=exact same. I'd rethink calling people dumb.
Click to expand...

No it's not the exact same. But the comment was clearly a swipe at the UK's justice system. A person found not guilty is treated exactly the same in the US and UK. I am not a fan of Piers Morgan but guests on his show take far too many swipes at his country of origin.
 
#2,710
#2,710
hog88 said:
Yes but we were smart enough to put the burden of proof on the prosecution instead of the defendant.
Click to expand...

It's true in self defence cases the defendant has the burden of proof. But our self-defence laws are very very different to those in the US. Zimmerman would've been found guilty in a UK court for sure. But then again we don't have to place as much emphasis on concealed handguns when we legislate.
 
#2,711
#2,711
alexmanu said:
It's true in self defence cases the defendant has the burden of proof. But our self-defence laws are very very different to those in the US. Zimmerman would've been found guilty in a UK court for sure. But then again we don't have to legislate for concealed handguns.
Click to expand...

Don't lie, in every case the burden of proof in the UK is on the defendant.

And yes he probably would have been found guilty in a country full of pu$$ys.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#2,712
#2,712
hog88 said:
Don't lie, in every case the burden of proof in the UK is on the defendant.

And yes he probably would have been found guilty in a country full of pu$$ys.
Click to expand...

No I am not lying, you don't know UK law.

And I find your other statement rather pathetic.
 
#2,715
#2,715
hog88 said:
Both statements were 100% true.
Click to expand...

No they weren't. The burden of proof is placed upon the prosecutor in the majority of areas of law. Self-defence happens to be an area of UK law where the burden of proof switches to the defendant. You clearly know nothing.

And if we are such pu$$ys then why did we stand up to the Nazis before you lot decided to waddle in?
 
#2,716
#2,716
alexmanu said:
No they weren't. The burden of proof is placed upon the prosecutor in the majority of areas of law. Self-defence happens to be an area of UK law where the burden of proof switches to the defendant. You clearly know nothing.

And if we are such pu$$ys then why did we stand up to the Nazis before you lot decided to waddle in?
Click to expand...

Stood up? Got you a$$ kicked and begged for real men to come bail you out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#2,719
#2,719
hog88 said:
Stood up? Got you a$$ kicked and begged for real men to come bail you out.
Click to expand...

Oh so you admit you don't know anything about UK law? LOL I'm not surprised. You usually don't know what you're talking about. Just ramble on like a complete twit.
 
#2,720
#2,720
alexmanu said:
No they weren't. The burden of proof is placed upon the prosecutor in the majority of areas of law. Self-defence happens to be an area of UK law where the burden of proof switches to the defendant. You clearly know nothing.

And if we are such pu$$ys then why did we stand up to the Nazis before you lot decided to waddle in?
Click to expand...


Oh no you didn't.

Next time. We will let you learn German you ungrateful ass
 
#2,721
#2,721
alexmanu said:
No they weren't. The burden of proof is placed upon the prosecutor in the majority of areas of law. Self-defence happens to be an area of UK law where the burden of proof switches to the defendant. You clearly know nothing.

And if we are such pu$$ys then why did we stand up to the Nazis before you lot decided to waddle in?
Click to expand...

Learn your history. The US was helping Britain covertly from the beginning. I interviewed a WW2 soldier whose ship was sunk by the Germans while sending supplies to your country BEFORE we were ever officially a part of the war. He was in the water for 17 hours not sure if he would live or die.
 
#2,724
#2,724
alexmanu said:
No they weren't. The burden of proof is placed upon the prosecutor in the majority of areas of law. Self-defence happens to be an area of UK law where the burden of proof switches to the defendant. You clearly know nothing.

And if we are such pu$$ys then why did we stand up to the Nazis before you lot decided to waddle in?
Click to expand...

Do you remember the deal where the British soldier was run down & sliced up awhile back by the black Muslims? In America the people wouldn't be standing around like its 2 kids fighting over a lollipop. Good chance somebody is packing & the soldier makes it at least to the hospital.
 
New Posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

Advertisement



Back
Top