Yes.
First, one of the things that the 'Fulmer-team'- and Cutcliffe too- is good at is identifying talent, and developing the physical potential of the players they get.
Second, the SEC is not only a "conference that's a tribut to parity", as one of the talking-heads put it, but there isn't a team in the SEC this year that doesn't have real weaknesses begging to be exploited.
Florida, taking teams as a whole, was no more
talented than us. They just showed up and used the talent they had while we didn't show up and used only a fraction.
Alabama, again as a whole, has much less (physical, potential) talent than we do. But they, damn Saban to hell, bring all they've got every game, and that beats talent + piss-poor attitude every time.
LSU is about our equal in raw talent. In fact, they are the proof of my "the SEC has parity of vulerability this year" theory. They showed up today, but just barely beat Bama. Why? Because they, like UF and us, they have great talent at some positions but real youth/ weaknesses at others. Yet, unlike us, LSU actually showed up at Tuscaloosa today, and as a result played the kind've game we should have- win or lose.
We've really do have the talent to beat anybody in this year's SEC. Unfortunately, I can't name a single team in the SEC, except maybe Ole Miss, who is less certain of playing up to their potential, one game to the next.