Vol knight
Text a Buddy!
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2013
- Messages
- 9,105
- Likes
- 3,310
I doubt that will be a concern.
However just opinion wise, I don't Lesnar/Reigns ends the night. I think they go with HHH/Sting or Wyatt/Taker, especially if they put a career ending stip on the latter.
Over there, it's like Trips theme song but replace the word king with Bryan.lol:
Yeah.
They had a couple of the early WM outside and Taker was in the light. Can't remember but it's the one versus Giant Gonzalez. They gave him a buzzard.
Yeah I remember but that was early Taker, now Undertaker and the experience of his entrance are Wrestlemania. Compare it to Tennessee running onto the field at Neyland without the band or the T lol.
I get Reigns isn't there yet but he's not bad. He's more along than 2005 Cena. So I don't buy it's just Roman that fans don't like.
I enjoyed Bryan's run last year. But that was last year. I'm ready to see what they got this year.
He's not boring and he can work. I like Bryan.
But the absolute undying love (not from this thread) the IWC gives him is perplexing.
I gotcha now.
It'd be different. But maybe you can do something with it. I don't know.
I know it won't happen but I want them to really humanize Taker for this feud. Have Bray call him Mark. Say something about his wife Michelle. Stuff like that.
BTW, early reports are Casket Match between Taker and Wyatt.
What's the "IWC"? Fans who discuss the shows on internet sports forums? Fans who use the internet to watch via the WWE Network? Fans who use the internet to follow twitter that the company actively promotes and uses?
The "IWC" is always used as some derogatory stereotype for a niche of fans. Except that it isn't 1997 and there aren't 104 total people on a single irc chat talking about the inner workings and Indies. 90% of anyone who actively follows WWE watches or gets news from the internet.
It's like the term "Smark". How is a 'Mark'.....smart? The word originally was made to describe fans who believed in the kayfabe and inherently were ignorant of the business.
Just two things that irk me.
Reigns is nowhere near 2005 Cena. 2005 Cena is on a completely different level. Cena at the time was really good on the mic and had great matches. And another point, size sometimes really doesn't matter in real life fights. I don't mind seeing smaller guys with larger ones.
I think Cena's charisma definitely stands out but they are different guys too.
Also poor Reigns has been booked with Kane and Show a decent majority of the time.
Only way I could see this being a match that would be believable is if it had a stipulation like Submission Match. No other way does a Bryan win appear believableDaniel Bryan is the most over guy on the roster. Him vs Brock at Wrestlemania for the title would be the money match.
I watched an episode of Total Divas. Go ahead and make fun of me for it, lol, but it was an episode about Paige and Brie going out drinking together while on the European Tour. Paige is freakin' hilarious.
The crowd is taking a beating on social media, some "news" outlets, etc.
Sting literally got a reaction that "The New Day" gets from an actual loud/active crowd on a random Monday night.
Luckily, he should get a decent pop at a Wrestlemania. I'm weird like that, all I could think of was here he is standing by the curtain, his music hits and....literally nothing.
