WWE Thread II

Status
Not open for further replies.
#4,501
#4,501
Volwark said:
Ladies and gentlemen....VINCENT KENNEDY MCMAHON!!
Click to expand...

Yep. Don't get me wrong, he's had a great career but when it's time to go, it's time to go. The business has passed him by and it's so painfully obvious to everyone but him.

On the other hand though, maybe Ambrose and Barrett can make the IC title actually mean something again. I won't get my hopes up for that though because whoever wins will probably continue to be a jobber in non title matches. Sigh.
 
#4,502
#4,502
And I like just watching wrestling and there are enough solid promos I will stay, plus the WWEN is pure awesome. But I just get tired of the inconsistent and stupid by wwe sometimes.
 
#4,503
#4,503
Daloth said:
I'm ok with Ambrose and Barret honestly. Two really really good wrestlers, and even better talkers. We need to get back to the days where the intercontinental title means something.
Click to expand...

I agree, I like the idea.
 
#4,504
#4,504
zjcvols said:
I'm starting to doubt that Vince was ever a genius and just surrounded himself with the right people during his run. He hasn't put a solid consistent program in eight years.
Click to expand...

I think he was genius in making the WWF as big as it was in the 80's, but with the Attitude era I think it was a combination of him getting lucky, being surrounded with the right people, and frankly low browing it. He showed more of the tit, as Ted Turner said.

Now...I think he's just a senile, out-of-touch old man. He is George Lucas.
 
#4,506
#4,506
Daloth said:
I'm ok with Ambrose and Barret honestly. Two really really good wrestlers, and even better talkers. We need to get back to the days where the intercontinental title means something.
Click to expand...

This is completely true but good wrestlers can't do that on their own. Good wrestlers have held the IC title in the past, the problem is that they always lose non title matches on Raw and it makes them and the title seem meaningless. If the IC title is ever going to mean something again, they have to start booking the champions differently.
 
#4,507
#4,507
On another note.. It said United States Championship vs Rusev at Fast Lane on the screen when Cena started talking. Surely Cena isn't competing for the United States title?
 
#4,509
#4,509
Volwark said:
I think he was genius in making the WWF as big as it was in the 80's, but with the Attitude era I think it was a combination of him getting lucky, being surrounded with the right people, and frankly low browing it. He showed more of the tit, as Ted Turner said.

Now...I think he's just a senile, out-of-touch old man. He is George Lucas.
Click to expand...

You're right he was a genius in the 80's. Honestly, I don't think it as much effect, but ever since WWE went PG, it's been downhill. I think WWE can put on great programming without a PG-14 raging but since then it has not been consistently solid.
 
#4,510
#4,510
ericberry4heisman said:
On another note.. It said United States Championship vs Rusev at Fast Lane on the screen when Cena started talking. Surely Cena isn't competing for the United States title?
Click to expand...

I was SHOCKED to see that. Cena is going to carry the US title!?!?!
 
#4,514
#4,514
GAVol said:
Why would they do a non title match at a PPV? They can't get away with that.
Click to expand...

Because Cena is way above the United States Championship. They've done similar things in the past. If the championship is on the line, it makes it obvious that Cena isn't going over in my opinion.
 
#4,519
#4,519
Notorious B.E.N said:
Do we see Taker here or nah?
Click to expand...

I don't know that we'll "see" Taker as in, live and in person, but I was thinking the same thing. If they want to set up Wyatt vs. Taker for WM, and they don't want to make Wyatt look weak with a "clean" loss here, dim the lights, hit the gong, and Ziggler can steal the win and Wyatt will have a good laugh in the ring.
 
New Posts

Status
Not open for further replies.
Advertisement



Back
Top