WWE Thread II

Status
Not open for further replies.
#2,682
#2,682
He could have taken both of them out, and then carried Ambrose away.

It still pisses me off, that nothing became of Kane. He just reappeared one day as a lackey for The Authority.
 
#2,684
#2,684
This finish isn't going over well on Twitter!

Not seeing it and based on how I heard it ended. They should have had Ambrose get the win and then have him attacked by Wyatt on RAW tomorrow night.
 
#2,685
#2,685
CagleMtnVol said:
This finish isn't going over well on Twitter!

Not seeing it and based on how I heard it ended. They should have had Ambrose get the win and then have him attacked by Wyatt on RAW tomorrow night.
Click to expand...

I think because we had two matches plus MITB where there was no clean finish. I do get that.

However if you are going to do that, IT HAS to be on PPV.
 
#2,689
#2,689
They are going out of their way to make Rollins appear cowardly yet not too weak so he can't really lose, but he can't win cleanly either I suppose. Still would've preferred a clean finish then have Bray step in. Which makes the pic all the more fitting.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20141027_072255.jpg
    IMG_20141027_072255.jpg
    43.4 KB · Views: 1
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#2,690
#2,690
volfanbill said:
WWE refuses to close a storyline aanymore. That's the problem
Click to expand...

That's my issue with WWE in a nutshell. That's why I wander away for weeks/months at a time.

With angles seeming to be indefinite, most stuff seems to be slapped together week to week. Most of the time it feels like they're just treading water.

I still think they'd do well to change the way they lay out some (not all) story arcs. Treat it like a TV show. Take some writers, give them a few weeks, and I have to think they could come up with a complete 6-9 month arc complete with weekly points to hit that gradually build up an angle (and with a set plan, it would hurt to take a week or 2 off here and there).

I realize they'd still need to run short duration stuff with a roster as deep as they have, I'd really love some more slow burn type stuff.
 
#2,691
#2,691
WallyBalls said:
That's my issue with WWE in a nutshell. That's why I wander away for weeks/months at a time.

With angles seeming to be indefinite, most stuff seems to be slapped together week to week. Most of the time it feels like they're just treading water.

I still think they'd do well to change the way they lay out some (not all) story arcs. Treat it like a TV show. Take some writers, give them a few weeks, and I have to think they could come up with a complete 6-9 month arc complete with weekly points to hit that gradually build up an angle (and with a set plan, it would hurt to take a week or 2 off here and there).

I realize they'd still need to run short duration stuff with a roster as deep as they have, I'd really love some more slow burn type stuff.
Click to expand...

That's the usual plan, but I think they are so scared of injuries now that grey can't commit to this fully. They do have wide range plans, but because of injuries and whatnot, they are always having to change. Wyatt and Orton were both supposed to be turning face. The Orton turn still seems likely, but I'm not sure about Wyatt now. Will be interesting to see how they spin this Ambrose Wyatt feud.

It's crazy that just a couple of months ago, WWE was incredibly short on faces, now it's quickly turning to the opposite. Reigns and Barrett are both coming back soon and Barrett's angle was supposed to be heel, but the crowds (myself included) are eating him up. Who are going to be the heels other than Rollins and (rarely) Lesnar?
 
#2,692
#2,692
volfanbill said:
That's the usual plan, but I think they are so scared of injuries now that grey can't commit to this fully. They do have wide range plans, but because of injuries and whatnot, they are always having to change. Wyatt and Orton were both supposed to be turning face. The Orton turn still seems likely, but I'm not sure about Wyatt now. Will be interesting to see how they spin this Ambrose Wyatt feud.

It's crazy that just a couple of months ago, WWE was incredibly short on faces, now it's quickly turning to the opposite. Reigns and Barrett are both coming back soon and Barrett's angle was supposed to be heel, but the crowds (myself included) are eating him up. Who are going to be the heels other than Rollins and (rarely) Lesnar?
Click to expand...

Nikki Bella
 
#2,693
#2,693
I don't think it will happen, but if Bray brings out a "Sister Abigal" who do you guys think could pull it off?

I always thought Alicia Fox would do a great job with a serious gimmick but she's been around too long.
 
#2,694
#2,694
zjcvols said:
I don't think it will happen, but if Bray brings out a "Sister Abigal" who do you guys think could pull it off?

I always thought Alicia Fox would do a great job with a serious gimmick but she's been around too long.
Click to expand...

I thought it needed to be Paige's first on-screen character
 
#2,697
#2,697
Rollins really does do a good job of the cowardly heel. He can pull it off. I hated seeing them send Punk through that routine because it didn't fit his character at all IMO.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
New Posts

Status
Not open for further replies.
Advertisement



Back
Top