It was a terrible, terrible product. It had interesting character-actors (Pine, Gadot) which were severely underutilized and a story that didn't need to be told which couldn't hold my attention amid the glut of meaningless action-lite sequences. Gadot had no solid footing to stand on and be... Gadot. Pine was checked out the entire movie.
Which villain is the villain? The one who doesn't actually want to do anything bad and never seemed to comprehend anything around him in the slightest? - yet wasn't menacing as a madman?... or the desperate cat? Wiig is more than capable... not sure what the heck happened there.
For what it's worth, I would rather have seen a film/story in which Gadot was given the tools and support to stand on her own as a leading-lady/attraction. She deserves it, and the franchise deserves it, but it seems the executives felt that Pine had to be brought back to draw the numbers. The entire franchise would probably be better off if someone else had been cast in his place to begin with. I say that meaning - he is TOO good in that role, his characters are always too likable. He was too strong of a presence beside Gadot in her first big, leading role.
All of that aside. Without the historical WWI background, the entire film felt exactly like the first 15 minutes of the first film - where accents were atrocious and acting was ... lacking. In both cases, I've seen the actors involved perform incredibly in other roles, so it was not a capacity issue.
It will make money, and they will make another one. I hope that Jenkins is either given complete control without any strings - or - if that is what happened in this film, I hope the is given the opportunity to move on. I am so glad that I did not pay extra $$ to see it.
oh... and in 1984, if someone dropped a revolver on the floor in our mall, the closest person would've said, "Hey man, you dropped your revolver." That scene was certainly a 2020 projection