I'm sure all Lady Vol fans and fans of other Women's teams are just devestated that you could care less for their sport.Well done Lady Vols.
I now end my period of self-censorship on the subject. And while I remain committed to my position that women's college basketball is approximately 1/10,000th as entertaining as the men's game, and while I still believe that it is wasteful and inappropriate for the women's tournament to try to imitate the men's tournament, I will admit that its a big deal for the people who are involved and they deserve their day in the sun.
i actually don't disagree........the game against UNC and large portions of last nights game were not excatly asthetically pleasing to the eye. I would also agree that the talent pool for all D 1 Women's programs would allude to the fact that 64 teams is about 32 too many. weren't there several teams in this tourny with losing records?Well done Lady Vols.
I now end my period of self-censorship on the subject. And while I remain committed to my position that women's college basketball is approximately 1/10,000th as entertaining as the men's game, and while I still believe that it is wasteful and inappropriate for the women's tournament to try to imitate the men's tournament, I will admit that its a big deal for the people who are involved and they deserve their day in the sun.
I'm sure all Lady Vol fans and fans of other Women's teams are just devestated that you could care less for their sport.
Back on Topic : Way to go Ladies!!!
I'm sure all Lady Vol fans and fans of other Women's teams are just devestated that you could care less for their sport.
Back on Topic : Way to go Ladies!!!
i actually don't disagree........the game against UNC and large portions of last nights game were not excatly asthetically pleasing to the eye. I would also agree that the talent pool for all D 1 Women's programs would allude to the fact that 64 teams is about 32 too many. weren't there several teams in this tourny with losing records?
anyway, it does simply boil down to personal preference, and that last line is all that matters. the accomplishment is what is, and it should only matter that those accomplishments are placed on their own and kept separate from a comparison with the men's game, cause there is no comparison.
there was a big debate on the radio yesterday about CPS and here perceived ability to coach the men's game based n here experience as a HC at the women's level......it was quite interesting to hear some of the real views of both listeners and the hosts......
Not just me that feels this way, my friend. Witness the disparity in posting on this board when UT was playing OSU in the men's S16 versus the posting for the women's FINALS. Imagine if the men had reached the finals of the NCAA this year? The server would have exploded!
I'm not saying that the women's game is inherently pointless or valueless. What I am saying is that it should stop pretending to be something it isn't.
I love coach summit but I don't think she can coach the men's game.
Not just me that feels this way, my friend. Witness the disparity in posting on this board when UT was playing OSU in the men's S16 versus the posting for the women's FINALS. Imagine if the men had reached the finals of the NCAA this year? The server would have exploded!
I'm not saying that the women's game is inherently pointless or valueless. What I am saying is that it should stop pretending to be something it isn't.