With two of the three spots filled, Vols 9th in SEC recruiting

#27
#27
We've still got spots for higher rated guys.

It's ahead of CCM's first full signing class to this point. Reese, Edwards and Moore.

CDT came to UT in April, and in about 5 weeks signed a class better than the one Cuonzo had 3 years to recruit. I'm not worried about him being a better recruiter than CCM. Pretty obvious that he's better.

Tyndall has gotten a lot of guys on campus. He's doing really well with 2016 guys as far as getting involved and getting them to visit.

Martin's first full class ranked 43rd, funny you left that part out...
 
#29
#29
I said "to this point" and I don't have an agenda. Good grief.

Hopefully Tyndall will have a 2015 5* kid become available mid year as well.

It's very possible, there's rumors Skal might, we'll see if Tyndall can beat out some blue bloods for his services with an open scholarship.
 
#31
#31
It could be that he includes Stokes as part of the first class. You seem to want to create the agenda by jumping to conclusions. There really isn't a way of distinguishing which class he belongs in.

Well 247 rankings included him on the second class, ziti prefers to include him in neither:
 
#33
#33
247, same site that has Tyndall's current class 49, and 2012 class....like I said, his first full class.

Just making sure which one u were talking about.....why argue about which coach can suck worst at recruiting....adding in Stokes and just 43....yuck
 
#38
#38
All his posts in regards to recruiting are now, give it time, he's doing fine, he's recruiting better than the last guy etc etc

Lol? That constitutes as an "agenda" now?? Lol, I was patient with CCM as well. There's no agenda.

And for the record, to this point he's done fine and done better than the last guy. So both those statements are fact and not "agenda."
 
#39
#39
Just making sure which one u were talking about.....why argue about which coach can suck worst at recruiting....adding in Stokes and just 43....yuck
Point simply was you can't say how bad Zo's first class was, and then make excuses for Tyndall's and say he's a better recruiter, not talking about you directly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#42
#42
Lol? That constitutes as an "agenda" now?? Lol, I was patient with CCM as well. There's no agenda.

And for the record, to this point he's done fine and done better than the last guy. So both those statements are fact and not "agenda."

His 49th ranked class is better than Zo's 43rd? I'm no genius, but even I can tell which one is ranked higher.

Is it possible it may end up higher, sure, but that's speculation and to this point it's not looking likely.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#43
#43
His 49th ranked class is better than Zo's 43rd? I'm no genius, but even I can tell which one is ranked higher.

Is it possible it may end up higher, sure, but that's speculation and to this point it's not looking likely.

Uh, ok. Who were his first two commits in that class?
 
#45
#45
According to 247 we will take 5 and let the numbers work themselves out. Idk who in the world we could be dropping but tifwiw
 
#47
#47
According to 247 we will take 5 and let the numbers work themselves out. Idk who in the world we could be dropping but tifwiw

That came from Rucker or Callahan, or just a poster? That would be 2 current guys leaving, Krager maybe on his way out?
 
#50
#50
In my opinion, we should let these guys senior years play out. It seems as if both of them have very recently improved and will continue to do so. I may be wrong, and unlike a lot of folks around here, will be glad to admit it once the time comes. The staff likes these kids, to the point that VQ said Phillips was number 2 on the board. Let things play out before we whole sale give up hope. We should be better than that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Advertisement



Back
Top