- Joined
- Oct 24, 2003
- Messages
- 116,013
- Likes
- 69,419
At SoCal he recruited,...and? I think their offense put them is some pretty choice positions to play defense any way they wanted to, regardless of who was coaching. So I
I'm not willing to give Coach O the credit for the SoCall dynasty just yet. I wasn't there, but I think Chow and a few of the other nobodies that coached there had something to do with the success out there, and hell Coach Carroll might have a hand in some of the coaching decision too? And he was lucky to be on the staff at SoCal because if they were so great due do The O, maybe Paul Hackett would have kept his job longer?
Coach O was brilliant at Ol' Miss wasn't he,...what did that cup of coffee get em' ??? Think that speaks for itself.
And as far as coaching in the NFL,...hiding out in that league and being an anonymous kog in the wheel isn't really an accomplishment. There isn't much "coaching up" in that league, what coaching there is means coaching the skills of the players into a win scheme, and when I see the Dave Campos of the world, June Jones, & host of Jerry Glanville's making careers on Sunday it doesn't inspire confidence that the NFL is the breeding ground of AWESOMENESS? Nobody will ask him back to that level and there is enough bad football minds allowed in the NFL for a short-time for everyone.
those are facts....enjoy the Louisville Game
"ok" - see I can supply one word responses also.
Man, the banter and ability to discuss is staggering on here. The longer I'm on VolNation the more and more it just seems like a kool-aid page instead of actual page about knowledge and critical examination of the sport and UT. But there is a lot of gramatical knowledge to be learned from the debate, so I guess that is a bonus.
Can't wait till the off-season when tha playas start going to jail. ....
I'm not sure what there is to discuss when you just basically intimated that the NFL is full of a bunch of coaches with the IQ of a Cocker Spaniel that are looking to hide from real jobs. It's just ludicrous."ok" - see I can supply one word responses also.
Man, the banter and ability to discuss is staggering on here. The longer I'm on VolNation the more and more it just seems like a kool-aid page instead of actual page about knowledge and critical examination of the sport and UT. But there is a lot of gramatical knowledge to be learned from the debate, so I guess that is a bonus.
I'm not sure what there is to discuss when you just basically intimated that the NFL is full of a bunch of coaches with the IQ of a Cocker Spaniel that are looking to hide from real jobs. It's just ludicrous.
Well?...alot of em' don't coach?
What about the Ol' Miss position?
How bout' the Justice League of Coaches at SoCal for the past decade?
What about The O being on Hackett (I got fired from SoCal) staff and not winning?
What about if The O was so awesome he would have stayed in the NFL, THE PINNACLE OF FOOTBALL?
Just askin',....there were a few other points,...the cocker-spaniel joke was funny though.
You may want to argue about what his title actually means, but CEO's title at UT is "assistant head coach/recruiting coordinator/defensive line".
I'm pretty sure AHC > DC
Sorry Admiral.
But when you start out all full of fire and vinegar, and then complain about the lack of intellectual discussion, well - it comes across as a load of bull.
Next time come in with some valid points and you might get a better reception.
Maybe.
^This. Cotton is just arguing for the sake of arguing. He has much more upside at UT and turning UT's program around will look MUCH better on his resume than being at UGA for 1-2 years as DC anyway.
Nobody said anything about upside, or turning a program around, or fluffing his resume. I said the move wouldn't be lateral because DC at Georgia is a rung higher on the hierarchical ladder than position coach at UT, and that is truth.
As for the equation, it is simply wrong. If AHC > DC, then Orgeron is above Monte. Anybody believe that is actually the case?
Thanks for pointing out the exception that makes my case. As I already said earlier: "The salary situation at UT is unique and won't happen at UGA."
Now, would you like to point out any other examples?
The move wouldn't be lateral. I really don't understand the argument against that, especially when "exceptions" to your flawed reasoning only seem to make you think it is reinforced.
Examples of what, DC's being higher up the food chain than position coaches?
The move wouldn't be lateral. I really don't understand the argument against that, especially when "exceptions" to your flawed reasoning only seem to make you think it is reinforced.