If it was that simple, why does anything ever change at all, then? College football is cyclical. If historically strong programs have down periods, why do they always bounce back?
Losing may hurt recruiting (which it really isn't doing much with UT - again, our worst stretch perhaps ever and we're still getting top 10-15 classes every single year - and the darkest days are behind us, so why hasn't recruiting tanked if we're supposed to become an irrelevant and mediocre program?), but a wide variety of factors can turn the tide, and that's usually associated with money.
I'd still like to see this part of the post be addressed. Tennessee basically hit their lowest point ever in the last few years...yet they're still pulling in strong classes. If one little slump is supposed to make us permanently irrelevant, how can you explain this?
Projected to have great recruiting & winning are 2 different realities.
Not in the context of this conversation. You're stating that we won't be able to attract big name recruits forever if we hit a slump. Well, Michigan did just that, and they're not in a high profile recruiting area. Clearly, something else is assisting their ability to recruit.
Oregon has more excitment in a single game than UT does all year, plus they have the marketing $ and weight of Nike.
Um....that's exacty my point. They had a huge injection of money into their athletic department and it's done wonders for them - because money is ultimately what decides which programs come out on top.
Oregon also has California nearby and only 2 or 3 major programs fighting over recruits in a state with a population of 33 million. What are the big time program within 600 miles of Eugene? How many big time programs within 600 miles of Knoxville? LSU, Bama, VT, GA, UF, FSU, Ohio sate, WVU, Mich, USCar, etc.
There's also way more talent in the entire south than there is in California. Yet both Oregon and Tennessee are able to recruit with the big boys on a consistent basis within the region. Tennessee always recruits the south well, and with Dooley, especially Georgia. It's not just 'national' recruiting. Tennessee has a strong and consistent regional pool that they can use their wealth of resources to recruit - like they always have.
What was Nebraska's average ranking at the end of the year over the last 5 years?
They're hitting 10 wins on a regular basis and expected to do really big things this year. And honestly, other than Bill Callahan, they've been an elite program on an almost annual basis for an extremely long time.
It would be nice if I am wrong, but wishing away the lousy performance won't change reality on the scoreboard. UT has huge demographics problem- lousy high school football in Tn, low Black population within UT's home recruiting region and being forced to recruit nationally. From what I saw, UF is good, but hardly great and will probably lose at least 2 or 3 games this year (Bama, USC and FSU) so it isn't like we lost to the eventual national champs or even SEC champs.
That hasn't stopped up at all in the past, even when we've hit slumps. Again, convince me that money isn't way more important than location. The strongest programs are the ones with the biggest budgets (the correlation is extremely alarming) - not which ones are located in Florida and Texas. And if you look at the decline of teams like FSU and Miami, it's clear that other factors are in play and more evidence that the whole state thing is starting to decline.
I hope Dooley can convince some 5 star recruits that they can come to UT and make a difference right away or ride the bench at Bama, UF, FSU , etc, but if he doesn't turn this program's trajectory around soon, the crater may be too deep for us to recover.
See, that just makes no sense. If Dooley can't recruit elite players and win a ton of games in the next couple of games, we're doomed...FOREVER :scare: