MontyPython
Dorothy Mantooth is a saint!
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2019
- Messages
- 8,680
- Likes
- 12,780
Or, conversely, we can and will just “play on” when someone comes down with COVID-19 since the virus presents incredibly little danger to student-athletes across the country.
Fish: Catching football fever. Literally
I recognize that COVID-19 is “worse” than the flu, but there’s simply no reason to grind everything to a halt as a result of a positive case just as illness spread during the other 150 seasons of this sport’s history haven’t forced complete stoppages.
I get it. And you're right that the current virus isn't a threat to younger people, so your argument is definitely compelling. FWIW, during the second wave of the Spanish Flu, the virus mutated such that it killed people within 24 hours... 675,000 Americans died in all. I suppose that at least would reduce the rate of transmission if it were to go that route. And, hey, maybe Trump's right... maybe it'll just disappear altogether. I'm open to that and, make no mistake, I definitely want a Vol football season. But, such a thing should be approached carefully.
The 1918 college football season was definitely affected. Of note, fans in the stands wore masks. Also of note, Tennessee had no official team in 1917 or 1918.
# # #
"...But it was a season which was greatly affected by the flu pandemic, as several teams’ games were canceled.
“Football seasons were also curtailed,” Roberts said. “Harvard only played three football games; most football teams really didn’t play many games that year because of the flu.”
Michigan and Pittsburgh, the aforementioned co-national champions, each played five games that season.
Local teams such as Arkansas and Oklahoma — which were both members of the Southwest Conference — also played limited schedules that season. The Razorbacks played just five games that season, going 3-2, while the Sooners had just six games to their credit."
Last edited: