Rich Rod was when UM hired him. How'd that big name hire work out?
Look, we all get it. Some people choose to employ only one means of evaluating a coach, and that is whether or not he's already won a NC, is in very high demand, and is mentioned on Sportscenter a lot. 'Is he a big name coach?' is the only basic question in evaluating a coaching hire for some.
Other people realize that those guys were not big names themselves at a point in time and understand that many of the 'big name' coaches of the near future are not big name coaches now. We look for characteristics and attributes that we think are good indicators of future success and base our impressions on that. Jim Harbaugh is arguably the hottest new big name coach in college football, but he was precisely squat when Stanford hired him.
So, by the 'big name' criterion, the Rich Rod hire was great and the Harbaugh hire was terrible. That line of thinking just strikes a lot of us as a foolish notion.