I definitely think there is something to the fact that the younger teams didn’t have as much time together to gel. I think as a coach when you’re dealing with these younger guys you learn how to coach them differently, what motivates them, what lineups work the best, how to discipline guys, etc... For example, in Duke’s loss to Notre Dame yesterday Jalen Johnson was MIA down the stretch. He’s far and away the most talented player on the floor. He should’ve been wrecking a 2-3 zone by playing in the middle of that zone making 15-17 footers and distributing the ball. He was awful in his decision making and turned the ball over multiple times. He was checked out and is a liability on D. Therefor he sat. That’s a small example of how I think things have gone with some of these teams that play a lot of young guys. However, I don’t think this would’ve happened w/ UK in 2012 or Duke in 2019. Those teams were loaded with legit NBA stars, who not only had the game physically, but were mentally better than most upperclassmen .I was wondering the same thing in the Duke/UNC thread.
Somebody more knowledgeable about CBB than me probably has a better answer, but I wonder if the schedule disruptions have affected the development of younger players more (particularly true freshmen), so it hurts programs that tend to go the one-and-done route.
If you take a look at some of the good teams this year...Gonzaga, Baylor etc., they tend to roll with more sophomores and juniors. Kentucky is a mess, and they are much more reliant on true freshmen. However, in UT's case, our 2 best players are true freshmen and we rely on them for scoring. So who knows.
The coaching career of Coach K is nearing it's endIt sounds too simple but at least with KU and UK (UT opponents), they just don't have the same horses they normally do. UT beat KU by 20 and should have beat UK that bad.
I watched a half of the Duke, UNC game. It looked the same way. They may have a player or 2 but for the most part are just not that good. It was just bad basketball.