ITSGR82BATNVOL
VOLS comin for ya...LET'S GO!
- Joined
- Jun 3, 2009
- Messages
- 3,539
- Likes
- 1,516
I'd really like to hear other fans perspective as to who is REALLY to blame / and WHY for the mess TN FOOTBALL currently finds it's self in:
I'll start: Although Kiffin is the popular choice, because of the way things played out, I don't think you can really blame him if you look at the facts. When he arrived, he promised to assemble a great staff. He promised to get the Tennessee name / power T out there among recruits again. He promised to go after the best talent available no matter where that was. When asked face to face by MH if he would have an interest in the USC job if approached he was honest and said yes. Although the way he exited hurt the program, if you are honest you can't deny he delivered on the promises listed above.
In regards to Phillip Fulmer. I don't think there is one fan alive (realistic fan that is) that can deny Fulmer sat on his laurels and let a once proud program decline in a major way under his rein. In my opinion Fulmer was hungry when he first got the job and was determined to take the program to a level his predecessor (Majors was unable to). He did exactly that, but once he reached the pinnacle of CB, he got fat and sassy (no pun intended). He lost that drive he once had and was content to sit back, and let the recruits come to him, rather than pursue them aggressively. That being said I find it hard to blame Fulmer for the mess we currently have.
In my opinion we now come to the real problem. We as hard core Vol fans saw our FB program start declining when we lost to LSU in the SEC CG early this decade. We saw that decline continue over the coming years, all the while MH continued to extend Fulmer's contract and give him substantial raises most years. My question is and always has been, is MH to blame for this or is Jim Haslam and the other big time boosters ? We all know UT is all about money, always has been and always will be.
I firmly believe keeping Fulmer as HC as long as the powers that be allowed is the reason we find ourselves in the mess we currently have. Had we made a change 3-4 years before we did, there were numerous quality coaches available, and the program was not nearly as depleted of players as it is now. I believe we could have attracted a quality coach then and we would never have regressed to to the point we currently find ourselves in.
Would like to hear other fan's thoughts on the subject.
I'll start: Although Kiffin is the popular choice, because of the way things played out, I don't think you can really blame him if you look at the facts. When he arrived, he promised to assemble a great staff. He promised to get the Tennessee name / power T out there among recruits again. He promised to go after the best talent available no matter where that was. When asked face to face by MH if he would have an interest in the USC job if approached he was honest and said yes. Although the way he exited hurt the program, if you are honest you can't deny he delivered on the promises listed above.
In regards to Phillip Fulmer. I don't think there is one fan alive (realistic fan that is) that can deny Fulmer sat on his laurels and let a once proud program decline in a major way under his rein. In my opinion Fulmer was hungry when he first got the job and was determined to take the program to a level his predecessor (Majors was unable to). He did exactly that, but once he reached the pinnacle of CB, he got fat and sassy (no pun intended). He lost that drive he once had and was content to sit back, and let the recruits come to him, rather than pursue them aggressively. That being said I find it hard to blame Fulmer for the mess we currently have.
In my opinion we now come to the real problem. We as hard core Vol fans saw our FB program start declining when we lost to LSU in the SEC CG early this decade. We saw that decline continue over the coming years, all the while MH continued to extend Fulmer's contract and give him substantial raises most years. My question is and always has been, is MH to blame for this or is Jim Haslam and the other big time boosters ? We all know UT is all about money, always has been and always will be.
I firmly believe keeping Fulmer as HC as long as the powers that be allowed is the reason we find ourselves in the mess we currently have. Had we made a change 3-4 years before we did, there were numerous quality coaches available, and the program was not nearly as depleted of players as it is now. I believe we could have attracted a quality coach then and we would never have regressed to to the point we currently find ourselves in.
Would like to hear other fan's thoughts on the subject.