Who's Now? Peyton or A-Rod

#1

jcolli30

Let's Hug it Out
Joined
Dec 4, 2006
Messages
2,735
Likes
11
#1
Michael Smith- Peyton
Mike Greenburg- A-Rod
Erin Andrews- A-Rod

Erin says that all the commercials of Peyton are "a little much.":dry:

It's really not a fair assessment. It's baseball season. If you did this during football season Peyton would be unanimous.
 
#3
#3
Although it kills me to disagree with my lovely Erin I'd expect that from a Gator Alumn...lol....Easy way to tell....

Championships:

A-Rod: O
Peyton: 1

Fan Support at Home:

A-Rod: depends on his last AB
Peyton: Is a God in Indy


Easy choice :)
 
#4
#4
how about "who's now" is a perfect sign that sports journalism is going down the crapper big time.
 
#7
#7
I was losing respect for ESPN already, but this show just got rid of any remaining respect I had for ESPN.
 
#8
#8
I don't think it is a show, but is a segment on Sportscenter until there is a winner declared.
 
#10
#10
The whole concept of the show is a mindless attempt to maintain some sort of interest in their pathetic network. I have seen about five total minutes of this drivel and it seems to me that all the guys on their panel are uncomfortable with being involved, except Stu. But I guess they get paid by ESPN for it so they do it.
 
#13
#13
if ESPN ever does a "Who's the greatest football team ever" 50 bucks says it ends up being the 2005 USC Trojans
 
#19
#19
Yeah... I mean, beating the Bears wasn't that much of a challenge. We all knew the AFC Championship was the real NFL title game, while the Superbowl was just a formality. Not to mention godawful this year. Definitley somewhere in the argument for worst Superbowl ever.

Pretty interesting conversation they had on the local sports talk station a couple weeks ago. ESPN's programming right now is so bad to the point where if a person or group came along with some (any) good ideas and a nice chunk of money, they could start a sports network and beat ESPN. Right now, the vast majority of sports fans outside New York City only watch ESPN because there is no alternative, and even then people only flip on the TV to catch the actual live games, and turn elsewhere for better coverage.
 
#20
#20
The whole concept of the show is a mindless attempt to maintain some sort of interest in their pathetic network. I have seen about five total minutes of this drivel and it seems to me that all the guys on their panel are uncomfortable with being involved, except Stu. But I guess they get paid by ESPN for it so they do it.

Yeah. Its a gimmic trying to keep us interested during boring baseball season. Its pretty bad.
 
#22
#22
can a mod please please delete this thread? we don't need threads on such assinine subjects littering the board.

thanks in advance.
 
Advertisement



Back
Top