Glocker_Alum_2005
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2013
- Messages
- 4,790
- Likes
- 5,621
But but look at all the games he's won, pretty impressive ...wait, I mean, he looks elite compared to Pruitt's 5.
Lol.
God yes, we need "best ever interviews" forget wins. (seems we thought, for awhile, we had a good interview last guy here). AND I think PRUITT will bring wins given time. Leach might have just moved on trying to win recruiting and winning with his style in the SEC.To be clear if I didn’t care much about how many we won or lost: Mike Leach
His interviews are some of the best ever
I’m happy to have Pruitt I think he’ll be exactly what Tennessee needs
That's a solid point.
I don't think that's why Gundy would fail though.
that's a myth though. Spurrier's teams were balanced. He focused on running the ball well. That gets lost because his air attack was so lethal and he never let up off the gas.I think the same can be said about being balanced on offense too....I didn't list that requirement bc someone would have came back with "the 90's Spurrier teams"...
The SEC is just different.
I think that's it. Same reason you don't see it totally translate to the NFL. I actually respect the Pac12 and Big12 more than most here. That said, you see a lot more of their D's with "holes". They produce some great players but usually beside a great DL you'll see a couple of guys who are "complimentary". Typically in the SEC... those "complimentary" type players are a couple of levels up and if they aren't... they get exposed.... You have to ask the question, why? I have some ideas. A few of them have to do with the SEC programs building around not just having lightening quick athletes....But humongous/powerful lightening quick athletes.
hat's a myth though. Spurrier's teams were balanced. He focused on running the ball well. That gets lost because his air attack was so lethal and he never let up off the gas.
Yeah, i never understand why folks feel the need to pretend that whomever is coaching this team is obviously the perfect cosch for us. Many if not most on here would be touting Schiano's great qualities had he been chosen.Let's reimagine this situation.
Imagine, instead, that we'd hired Gundy rather than Pruitt. Then today, with Gundy being our coach, Pride85 asks the exact same question.
Is your answer still Pruitt? Of course not.
Yeah, i never understand why folks feel the need to pretend that whomever is coaching this team is obviously the perfect cosch for us. Many if not most on here would be touting Schiano's great qualities had he been chosen.
Currently Pruitt has proven zero as a head coach. I hope and pray he will have changed that by the end of this season but the way the season wrapped up last year i am in a wait and see mode.