Which Team Had More "Talent" On The Field: UT Or MSU?

[Velo Vol]

??

It's a factor when comparing coaching performances.

 

[LocoVol]

Talent, UT did.

 

[BearCat204]

Im sure precious will say that MSU did when he has his show tomorrow

 

[GreatWhiteNorth]

UT did, and it's not even close.

 

[thebjd]

We did and it wasn't close.

 

[gcbvol]

UT was the more talented team without a doubt. Unfortunately our coaching disadvantage won out.

 

[FearlessFreep]

If you're really wondering which was the better coaching staff after viewing that game, then I'm afraid any salient argument would simply be lost into the ether that is your ability to comprehend the obvious.

 

[VolNavy01]

Tenn by far. That's what makes this loss even more frustrating.

 

[UTK]

Us by far. Thats why its coaching.

 

[Cdywolfe]

Talent wise we should've won this game by 14+

 

[volsfansince4387]

UT by a mile. Which team was more prepared? State ...by 20 miles.

 

[omghulkhands]

UT not close, not even a little bit. They have pedestrian RBs and WRs

 

[VFL 24/7]

Tennessee by far. But MSU has something we dont.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................a coach...

 

[Biopsyman]

They had 1 WR , but knew to line up against Brewer and Teague..

 

[X-Factor]

UT did, and it's not even close.

This.

 

[volchant]

UT by a ton we have better players on all sides our weakness is on the sideline.

 

[gordonr24]

UT easily. State is just well coached. Mullen gets the most out of the resources he has.

 

[JAllen18]

The only thing Miss St had that were better was Banks & Slay. The rest UT had the edge in talent.

 

[Bill4volz]

Tennessee did, by far.

 

[cavs37]

The first half made me really think they did, the way our D was getting run over by their RBs and WRs. The D proved in the 3rd that we had what it takes and should've won that game. No doubt we were more talented.

 

[Big Orange Junky]

You have to count defense too. Sure we have good offensive talent, but they had more talent on defense.

You would have to go position by postion and I bet MSU would be close or maybe even better counting the whole team.

People were saying the same thing after the Florida game, but when you went position by positionit was Florida by a large margin.

I suspect the talent level will be much different than most of the people in this thread think.

 

[615vols]

Tennessee, easily.

 

[ManningBerry#1]

I was mad when we lost to Florida and UGA, but tonight it went to another extreme because I knew we had far superior talent.

 

[Besteresque]

They had 1 WR , but knew to line up against Brewer and Teague..

Yeah why they hell was he being gaurded by Brewer on that 3rd and 7? Got to be terrible coaching.

 

[Velo Vol]

Turnovers are part of talent, and I think MSU has shown this season that their players are better holding onto or (defensively) turning over the ball.