ivtec_jrod
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2006
- Messages
- 1,779
- Likes
- 0
Let's put the game behind us and try to focus on the future. Use this game as a reference to identify problems and the most plausible solutions that will help for the rest of the year and for years to come.
The biggest problem in my eyes is our o-line. I never focus on the o-line (boring to watch) but I don't ever recall seeming a line from Tennessee that gets burnt on plays so often. The entire game it seemed like our guys were on their heels getting pushed backed and often holes were exposed causing pressure on the qb.
We all know that Crompton doesn't deal well with adversity, so why allow pressure on him to begin with?? Do you see where I am getting at? We are stuck with Crompton for this year so we need to make sure he doesn't get rattled or else we are screwed.
I honestly don't know if the line gave their all tonight. It just felt like they gave about a C effort tonight. I wish we get a line that was dominant. How do you do that???? You recruit hard at these positions. Linemen on both sides of the ball play pivotal roles in games an often serve as the catalyst between a win and a loss. Sound familiar (tonight if they gave the qb more time Crompton might not have freaked out as much).
I think CLK should have looked at throwing some play action passes to Hardesty up the middle and some mid-range passes to the tight ends. It seemed like we either threw wing passes in the flats or lengthy passes that Crompton has no business attempting. Crompton's performance completely changed the gameplan that was suppose to happen. Again it is easy to look at things in hindsight 20/20 and I am not trying to flame CLK. I thought he did a good job of maintaining a decent approach at calling plays. I mean he has a qb spraying the ball to everyone but his own team so he has to figure out a way to continue to move the ball, now knowing that UCLA knows that we have to run the ball.
The biggest problem in my eyes is our o-line. I never focus on the o-line (boring to watch) but I don't ever recall seeming a line from Tennessee that gets burnt on plays so often. The entire game it seemed like our guys were on their heels getting pushed backed and often holes were exposed causing pressure on the qb.
We all know that Crompton doesn't deal well with adversity, so why allow pressure on him to begin with?? Do you see where I am getting at? We are stuck with Crompton for this year so we need to make sure he doesn't get rattled or else we are screwed.
I honestly don't know if the line gave their all tonight. It just felt like they gave about a C effort tonight. I wish we get a line that was dominant. How do you do that???? You recruit hard at these positions. Linemen on both sides of the ball play pivotal roles in games an often serve as the catalyst between a win and a loss. Sound familiar (tonight if they gave the qb more time Crompton might not have freaked out as much).
I think CLK should have looked at throwing some play action passes to Hardesty up the middle and some mid-range passes to the tight ends. It seemed like we either threw wing passes in the flats or lengthy passes that Crompton has no business attempting. Crompton's performance completely changed the gameplan that was suppose to happen. Again it is easy to look at things in hindsight 20/20 and I am not trying to flame CLK. I thought he did a good job of maintaining a decent approach at calling plays. I mean he has a qb spraying the ball to everyone but his own team so he has to figure out a way to continue to move the ball, now knowing that UCLA knows that we have to run the ball.