Where did life begin? (Merged)

Do you believe we have a creator, aka "God"?


  • Total voters
    0
  • Poll closed .
There is more than enough evidence, you just choose to ignore it.

Too busy stomping waffles.

I'd say there is more compelling and irrefutable scientific evidence that proves without a shadow of a doubt that there is no god.

giphy_6e1c5b26-dfc0-42d2-b1c4-58f41627d314_large.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: 8 people
I'd say there is more compelling and irrefutable scientific evidence that proves without a shadow of a doubt that there is no god.

giphy_6e1c5b26-dfc0-42d2-b1c4-58f41627d314_large.gif

What proves God doesn’t exist?

In a universe that still expanding what scientist worth his salt would attest to such an absolute truth?
 
Your poll is too simplistic for a question like that and your description of agnosticism even worse. Agnosticism isn't necessarily some wishy washy indecisive stance. I don't know if there is a higher power that created us all and I don't actively believe in one, but I do strongly believe that all of the religions I've encounter's take on a creator is wrong.

What should it have said?
 
I'd say there is more compelling and irrefutable scientific evidence that proves without a shadow of a doubt that there is no god.

giphy_6e1c5b26-dfc0-42d2-b1c4-58f41627d314_large.gif

we exist, science says you can't get something from nothing, and there is no compelling scientific principal that says we have to exist. so far science has told us we are a vast anomaly.

Doesn't prove their is God, but if you want to follow through the thinking there would have to be some type of creator. something that got everything rolling at some infinite point in the past.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Yes, but fundamentalism in any form (Christianity, Islam, Etc) is one of the most dangerous threats to civilization and society currently.

I define with Christian Existentialism personally.
 
we exist, science says you can't get something from nothing, and there is no compelling scientific principal that says we have to exist. so far science has told us we are a vast anomaly.

Doesn't prove their is God, but if you want to follow through the thinking there would have to be some type of creator. something that got everything rolling at some infinite point in the past.

Science doesn't say "you can't get something from nothing." That's just a colloquialism that people treat as an absolute principle, since we generally have no experience otherwise. But how many people experienced the beginning of the universe (assuming there was one)?

Also, we have only explored a tiny portion of space; we don't know that life is a "vast anamoly."
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
I will acknowledge the possibility that a being beyond our current comprehension could exist. However, the details and mythos of man made religion (redundant, I know) are simply stories. Part of our culture as a species. Nothing is out there micromanaging our lives like Sim Planet, or keeping track of right and wrong. We are a blip in the universe with no more importance than any other space rock.

IMO
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
we exist, science says you can't get something from nothing, and there is no compelling scientific principal that says we have to exist. so far science has told us we are a vast anomaly.

Doesn't prove their is God, but if you want to follow through the thinking there would have to be some type of creator. something that got everything rolling at some infinite point in the past.

The problem is that such logic would also apply to the creator, too. Thus, you're right back where you started.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
Advertisement





Back
Top