BigOrangeTrain
Morior Invictus
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2013
- Messages
- 80,184
- Likes
- 92,447
Obviously there's a great deal of variation between simulations, so you have to run a lot of them to get a feel for which team the website really thinks is better. I ran one which had us winning 51-10, and then the very next one had us losing 23-13. Those are both outliers though, most have us winning by about 14.[/QUOTE)
I ran UT vr nu twenty five times the vols won twentyscore average 45-13 but i ran UT vr osu very vols won most and same for msu and lsu.auburn and stanfordvols won most but i did UT vs uk and cats won 3 of 5 so this is a joke
1)
2)
1) Running "computer simulations of games" and thinking that they mean ANYTHING is stupid. Might as well pull out the Mattel Electronics Football game and make predictions from it.
2) You obviously are not smart enough to seent what I did there.
Whatifsports has the 2015 College Football teams on and they had Tennessee beating Northwestern 45-7
https://www.whatifsports.com/ncaafb/default.asp#top
Will never happen.
After we went up 42-7 over Iowa, they outscored our reserves 21-3 in the 4th quarter to make the final score 45-28. Same deal with Vanderbilt a few weeks ago, where their starting QB tacked on two meaningless TDs with under 5:00 in the game to wind up losing 53-28.
So I'll predict something like 49-28 using the same logic. In a year or two, however, our reserves will even continue the beat-down.