Whatifsports has the 2015 College Football teams on and had Tennessee over NU 45-7

#4
#4
All this talk of a boatrace and blowout has me concerned.


just one man's opinion that has seen this movie before.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 8 people
#7
#7
From what I've been able to gather is they're very similar to Mizzou (with a slightly better offense). If you can score on them and get up early it will be a similar outcome to the TaxSlayer bowl. But if they can neutralize our run game then we are SOL. But based on how well we've ran against teams like Bama/Mizz with the addition of extra prep time I'm not too worried.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#10
#10
Obviously there's a great deal of variation between simulations, so you have to run a lot of them to get a feel for which team the website really thinks is better. I ran one which had us winning 51-10, and then the very next one had us losing 23-13. Those are both outliers though, most have us winning by about 14.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#12
#12
Whatifsports is the biggest rip. A complete waste of money for those that always enjoyed simming dynasty mode in NCAA. There is no logic to their system.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#13
#13
TCbodybuilder said:
Whatifsports is the biggest rip. A complete waste of money for those that always enjoyed simming dynasty mode in NCAA. There is no logic to their system.
Click to expand...

If there's no logic, then it fits perfectly with most of our posts on Volnation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 9 people
#16
#16
I ran it 5 times with UT winning 3. Odd thing I noticed was that their RB had over 200 yds in all 5 games. I don't see that happening.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#17
#17
I gotta say...

This is some of the most stupid stuff I've ever seent or heard...
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#21
#21
I just ran 2013 UT vs. 2015 UT, and 2013 won 58-35. They finished the game on a 58-14 run.
 
#22
#22
I ran 20 simulations cuz why not. Here's what I came back with:

13-3 W
44-7 W
3-31 L
24-21 W
24-16 W
14-35 L
14-10 W
20-13 W (OT)
21-22 L
43-6 W
16-21 L
24-17 W
25-3 W
36-25 W
13-12 W
45-10 W
38-7 W
36-28 W
9-20 L
30-6 W

15-5 record
Average score of 24.60 to 14.35
Largest positive point difference: +37 (twice, 44-7 and 43-6)
Largest negative point difference: -28 (3-31)

It's pretty clear that we're viewed as the better team by this site.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement



Back
Top