Vercingetorix
Fluidmaster
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2006
- Messages
- 31,177
- Likes
- 2,732
I highly doubt Chavis would've stayed on board with any coach not named Fulmer after how that whole thing went down. I could be wrong, but I just didn't see him breaking that "allegiance" to Fulmer and remaining on board at UT if a coach other than Kiffin had wanted him to stay.
Perhaps. But still, so? Even if Kiffin weren't Monte Kiffin's son, he probably could have hired a lot more proven DC in early December last year than Dooley is going to be able to get this winter. The staff is going to be a lot more slapdash than it would have been if we'd hired a new coach in early December. Which counts heavily against Kiffin's "left the program better" crap.