What would Jim Chaney do with this offense?

#26
#26
pharmDvol11 said:
Well the Sal Sunseri experiment didn't help.
Click to expand...

I tried to tell myself that. But if there was a game winning drive to pull out...he wasn't going to call it. Finally worked today. (Hope I jinx it). :)
 
#29
#29
That fumble doesn't come out and he was taking it to the house.
 
#34
#34
pharmDvol11 said:
Watching the Georgia game I can't help but think that our personnel would be a perfect fit for his scheme. I would like to think he'd use Kamara as Mckenzie where they'd line him up in the backfield but also in the slot. I like how they use their TE a lot. Also I could see Chaney rotating in 3 backs - Hurd, Kamara and Kelly - much in the same way Chubb, McKenzie and Michel are used. And although Dobbs doesn't throw the ball as well as Eason, his legs would continue to be a difference maker. I'd also trade Mahoney and cash for Pittman all day long!

These guys would fix a lot of our offensive problems. jmo
Click to expand...
He would have a tough time unless he changer QBs. Dobbs would not survive under his offense. QD would probably have started last year and this year. However, I don't think we would win more games this year because Dobbs is such a good runner. The Ol would still be weak even with Pittman.
 
#35
#35
Seriously? some of you people think Chaney did a good job here? Our offense was ranked like 116 his second or third year.
 
#36
#36
Bullsnot....I seem to remember airing it out and putting up 40+ during SEC games. If Sunseri didn't show up and we actually fielded a defense that year Dooley would have looked good but we couldn't stop anyone....offense was an all star team...who ended up in the nfl...Rivera,Bray, Hunter, cp, several on the line.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement



Back
Top