What would Jim Chaney do with this offense?

#1

pharmDvol11

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2011
Messages
4,151
Likes
3,601
#1
Watching the Georgia game I can't help but think that our personnel would be a perfect fit for his scheme. I would like to think he'd use Kamara as Mckenzie where they'd line him up in the backfield but also in the slot. I like how they use their TE a lot. Also I could see Chaney rotating in 3 backs - Hurd, Kamara and Kelly - much in the same way Chubb, McKenzie and Michel are used. And although Dobbs doesn't throw the ball as well as Eason, his legs would continue to be a difference maker. I'd also trade Mahoney and cash for Pittman all day long!

These guys would fix a lot of our offensive problems. jmo
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#3
#3
Eat it?

What do I win??!!

1470537647_Chaney_t1070_h7d4d68beb6338d8ec76725ff47d341abb530e73f.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#6
#6
He would call Hurd iso plays 33 times for almost no yardage. Just like he has done with Chubb.

I've seen Georgia throw the ball a lot in this game. Maybe I'm missing something here. The running game isn't working tonight but they're still moving the ball
 
#9
#9
I've seen Georgia throw the ball a lot in this game. Maybe I'm missing something here. The running game isn't working tonight but they're still moving the ball

It's how he operated at Tennessee. Tunnel vision. When it gets hot, he goes pass centrific. When he was in Knoxville he was the "worst thing ever", of course when he leaves we lost a genius. :)
 
#12
#12
Pass a lot and abandon the run. Basing this on what he already did at TN.

You're right he would do that at UT but Chaney is a much better coordinator than he was while here. Look at what he did at Ark? He keeps the defense honest. I all comes down to execution with his teams imo.
 
#13
#13
It's how he operated at Tennessee. Tunnel vision. When it gets hot, he goes pass centrific. When he was in Knoxville he was the "worst thing ever", of course when he leaves we lost a genius. :)

True. But it was a lot more fun to watch than whatever you call the offense we're running now. I was always a Chaney fan anyway. I thought he should've been retained but I also have the sense to know that's not how it works.
 
#14
#14
You're right he would do that at UT but Chaney is a much better coordinator than he was while here. Look at what he did at Ark? He keeps the defense honest. I all comes down to execution with his teams imo.

I thought he was good here but I was/am critical of him ditching the run to air it out like he did. Our offense put up a lot of points under CJC.
 
#15
#15
I thought he was good here but I was/am critical of him ditching the run to air it out like he did. Our offense put up a lot of points under CJC.

It was just a lot more fun to watch too. Definitely frustrating when he'd abandon the run. I don't disagree with that. Then again he didn't have Chubb and Sony Michel either.
 
#18
#18
Watching the Georgia game I can't help but think that our personnel would be a perfect fit for his scheme. I would like to think he'd use Kamara as Mckenzie where they'd line him up in the backfield but also in the slot. I like how they use their TE a lot. Also I could see Chaney rotating in 3 backs - Hurd, Kamara and Kelly - much in the same way Chubb, McKenzie and Michel are used. And although Dobbs doesn't throw the ball as well as Eason, his legs would continue to be a difference maker. I'd also trade Mahoney and cash for Pittman all day long!

These guys would fix a lot of our offensive problems. jmo

Edit: Beat Mizzou?
 
#21
#21
True. But it was a lot more fun to watch than whatever you call the offense we're running now. I was always a Chaney fan anyway. I thought he should've been retained but I also have the sense to know that's not how it works.

5 win seasons were 5 win seasons. I had no fun with it. :pinch:
 
Advertisement



Back
Top