With Spurrier at UF operating an offense few in the SEC could stop or stall this side of Bill Oliver?
About the same.
Fulmer in the 1990s was a far different coach. More ambitious. More willing to work.
More open to adjusting his system and approach to win games.
Fulmer in his last years grew comfortable in his position. He tried to take the Houston Nutt Arkansas route and sell mediocrity as the standard Tennessee should aspire to. This wasn't the same man who took a green Heath Shuler down to Athens and beat a Georgia team loaded with NFL talent. He wasn't the same guy who changed his approach from 1997 to 1998 after watching his team take a physical beat-down from Nebraska.
Fulmer wanted us to be satisfied with 8-win seasons. Sexton sold Hammy on the concept. Problem was that Fulmer wasn't hungry enough to even reach that goal on a regular basis. He lost his edge and his commitment to Tennessee. Not everyone can be General Neyland or Tom Osborne and maintain focus. What happened to Fulmer also happened to Dye and Vince Dooley: a slow, steady decline.
I'm thankful for his time at Tennessee in general and 1997 and 1998 in particular. I don't think we should remember him for what he became, but rather for what he once was as a head coach.