fundamentals83
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 2, 2014
- Messages
- 177
- Likes
- 178
I don't understand the play call (to go for 2) by GT. Your team has dominated most of the game. No need to try to steal a win when your offense is unstoppable and Tennessee is throwing up a 3 and out on 2/3 possessions. Conversely, I totally would have understood if Butch had gone for 2.
I don't understand the play call (to go for 2) by GT. Your team has dominated most of the game. No need to try to steal a win when your offense is unstoppable and Tennessee is throwing up a 3 and out on 2/3 possessions. Conversely, I totally would have understood if Butch had gone for 2.
I don't understand the play call (to go for 2) by GT. Your team has dominated most of the game. No need to try to steal a win when your offense is unstoppable and Tennessee is throwing up a 3 and out on 2/3 possessions. Conversely, I totally would have understood if Butch had gone for 2.
I thought it was the correct decision. We had not stopped the dive play all night. That being said 16 tried to win it himself and be the hero. He got lit up.
Johnson also understood the Vols had finally found their groove and could not be stooped from the 25 with a 1st down at that point.
This game was eerily similar to the Air Force game under PF years ago.
That's kinda my point, one missed block -- one great defensive play -- one botched snap -- and the game is over. Not sure why you bet it all on 1 play when you're dominating.
You're betting it all on 1 play when you kick the extra point, too. One great defensive play -- one botched snap -- one slip of the foot -- and the game is over. Even if successful, the best you do is tie.
Tech probably had a lot more confidence in their offense (rightfully so) than in their kicker. They evaluated not just the risk, but also the reward, and made a decision I can't fault them for.