duckman398686
VN's One and Only
- Joined
- Nov 8, 2004
- Messages
- 21,783
- Likes
- 150
Fulmer should only step down until he is ready to do so himself.
Yeah, I get all of that. But what I'm saying is that Fulmer would/should have a particular ability to see that something is amiss in that area. It doesn't mean he's sticking his head in meetings. But he watched all the tape, and he should be able to see it's not right. What I'm speaking to has nothing whatever to do with delegation v micromanagement.
Moreover, he hires his coordinators.
But see, CPF's modus operandi is to more or less blame the players for everything and pretend that there are no coaching problems.
I remember during and after the 2000 season where we went 8-4 and he talked about not having the players to win...and then sent the most players into the NFL that year followed up by one of his 2 or 3 most talented teams. He just seems delusional.
Liper,
I'm not privy to the relationship between Sanders and Fulmer or Cutcliffe and Fulmer, so I'm not going to go into that....Chewing out players in the media does absolutely nothing except hurt morale and create a rift between players and coaches.
The problem is that the media (particularly the TV media) gets an awful lot wrong.
After tonight I'm going Bama-Auburn stupid on this question and saying Fulmer can go 1-11 next year and I wont care so long as that one win is against UF.
The coaching staff at Florida is ten times what we have. They also have equal caliber athletes. Urban Meyer will be known as our new Spurrier someday.
You have to look at the complete body of work. Losing record against Florida, Losing record against Richt, Meyer, Spurrier, Saban, losing record against ranked teams at home since 1998, losing bowl record since 1998, no SEC title since 1998.Run him out because of what happened last year (if 1998 can't be used in support of him, then I move that 2005 can't be used against him)? Run him out because he's not some young hotshot?
You have to look at the complete body of work. Losing record against Florida, Losing record against Richt, Meyer, Spurrier, Saban, losing record against ranked teams at home since 1998, losing bowl record since 1998, no SEC title since 1998.
Liper,
I disagree. When someone becomes a head coach, he basically ceases to oversee the position group that he came from. The reason is that it becomes impossible to devote the amount of time and attention to detail to a position group that is warranted while also overseeing the entire team and program.
What have these threads proven or accomplished other than maybe having a few recruits discover them and decide against considering UT?... making your complaints into prophecies.
I have high expectations for next year. This year without the Ainge injury, I believe UT is in the BCS. Next year, they'll have less question marks than they had coming into this year in spite of losing 3 very good WR's.
I like Fulmer. I think this sometimes ridiculous negativism is harmful. But next year should be his year.
Someone mentioned that the road schedule was worse next year. I don't know how they figure that. Cal won't be nearly as good even at home. UF has more significant losses than UT and their Jr's haven't even had a chance to announce. It would be a surprise of Siler doesn't go and maybe one of the DL's. Bama will be mediocre next year even with Saban. Ark, UGA, and SC all go to UT... and UT doesn't play Aub or LSU.
UT always plays a tough schedule so that's about as favorable as it gets.
i don't even know where to begin with this...but i'll give it a shot.It's kind of interesting that these kinds of threads go on while Fulmer is out pulling in one of the best recruiting classes in the country.
What have these threads proven or accomplished other than maybe having a few recruits discover them and decide against considering UT?... making your complaints into prophecies.
I have high expectations for next year. This year without the Ainge injury, I believe UT is in the BCS. Next year, they'll have less question marks than they had coming into this year in spite of losing 3 very good WR's.
I like Fulmer. I think this sometimes ridiculous negativism is harmful. But next year should be his year.
Someone mentioned that the road schedule was worse next year. I don't know how they figure that. Cal won't be nearly as good even at home. UF has more significant losses than UT and their Jr's haven't even had a chance to announce. It would be a surprise of Siler doesn't go and maybe one of the DL's. Bama will be mediocre next year even with Saban. Ark, UGA, and SC all go to UT... and UT doesn't play Aub or LSU.
UT always plays a tough schedule so that's about as favorable as it gets.