Well I am sorry...but good grief

It's a messageboard; you posted it, people reacted. That's kind of how it works.

Don't go to the lame "why do you care" after pages of having your ass handed to you.

Having my ass handed to me on a message board. You are one hard ass aren't you. A regular Billy Bad Ass.
 
So? He didn't lose. And a ton of NCAAT teams benefit from upsets. It doesn't diminish what a team does.

Again, you can piss on his Sweet 16 all you want, the fact remains he did way more as a basketball coach than Dooley did as a football coach and it's not even debatable. Dooley didn't even have one winning season and lost to a Kentucky team using a WR as a QB.

Shouldn't the comparison be to Wade houston then?
 
Na I just said he was the bball equivalent of DD.

You acted like it. Didn't say it. You aren't following this? Doing exactly what you did with "y'all are acting like Cuonzo is best coach in history" post. exactly what you did, actually.
 
You acted like it. Didn't say it. You aren't following this? Doing exactly what you did with "y'all ate acting like Cuonzo is best coach in history" post. exactly what you did, actually.

Yes I know you are using my logic against me. Not very hard to spot. I just don't care though. Not nearly as much as you guys do.
 
You clearly didn't spot it. And you clearly care. You keep posting responses.

I just like to see what you guys have to say. I got tired of the argument 2 pages ago. Also I did spot it, just didn't care enough to acknowledge it.
 
I just like to see what you guys have to say. I got tired of the argument 2 pages ago. Also I did spot it, just didn't care enough to acknowledge it.

You spotted my sarcasm yet posted a serious response. Good one.You "don't care" but want to see what we have to say. Got it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Yean it's pretty funny seeing you guys get so worked up defending a mediocre coach.

More like pointing out a contradiction in about every one of your posts and seeing you backpedal.However, I am sure you are backpedaling for your own amusement, you don't care, etc etc. Have a good night, I'm exhausted.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
More like pointing out a contradiction in about every one of your posts and seeing you backpedal.

Didn't one of you say that Martin accomplished more than DD? What would that be? Losing in the Sweet Sixteen? That isn't much of an accomplishment. Hell Dooley lost in a bowl game.
 
Didn't one of you say that Martin accomplished more than DD? What would that be? Losing in the Sweet Sixteen? That isn't much of an accomplishment. Hell Dooley lost in a bowl game.

OK, I got one more. I didn't say that but it's true. Losing by a basket in the sweet 16 isn't same as losing the Music City bowl. My goodness. Losing the play in game would have been equivalent. Martin also beat more top 25 teams. Martin had 3winning seasons. Dooley had 0. Martin was 60 pct of his games, Dooley didnt hit 50 pct. Stats are hard. Is that enough? Every post you outdo yourself.
 
Last edited:
OK, I got one more. I didn't say that but it's true. Losing by a basket in the sweet 16 isn't same as losing the Music City bowl. My goodness. Losing the play in game would have been equivalent. Martin also beat more top 25 teams. Martin had 3winning seasons. Dooley had 1. Martin was 60 pct of his games, Dooley didnt hit 50 pct. Stats are hard. Is that enough? Every post you outdo yourself.

Dooley didn't have a winning season.
 
OK, I got one more. I didn't say that but it's true. Losing by a basket in the sweet 16 isn't same as losing the Music City bowl. My goodness. Losing the play in game would have been equivalent. Martin also beat more top 25 teams. Martin had 3winning seasons. Dooley had 1. Martin was 60 pct of his games, Dooley didnt hit 50 pct. Stats are hard. Is that enough? Every post you outdo yourself.

I guess for us that is an accomplishment, but for most schools losing in the sweet 16 is a failure and bad season.
 
I guess for us that is an accomplishment, but for most schools losing in the sweet 16 is a failure and bad season.

Are you a real person? I can think of over 100 programs that count that a success. Only 8 teams fared better.
 
OK, I got one more. I didn't say that but it's true. Losing by a basket in the sweet 16 isn't same as losing the Music City bowl. My goodness. Losing the play in game would have been equivalent. Martin also beat more top 25 teams. Martin had 3winning seasons. Dooley had 1. Martin was 60 pct of his games, Dooley didnt hit 50 pct. Stats are hard. Is that enough? Every post you outdo yourself.

Martin beat more top 25 teams, because he had more chances. There are more games in basketball than there are in football. So that is just a numbers game. SEC football is harder to win that SEC basketball. You cannot compare their winning percentages.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Martin beat more top 25 teams, because he had more chances. There are more games in basketball than there are in football. So that is just a numbers game. SEC football is harder to win that SEC basketball. You cannot compare their winning percentages.

You asked, I answered. With facts. You don't like facts so when losing, you change the game. Compare % of games won. Compare winning seasons. % game isn't tough to figure.....for most
 
Advertisement



Back
Top