Iowa is better than many are giving them credit. On any given Saturday, they'd beat a bunch of teams in the SEC. They're certainly capable of beating Tennessee, and the sad thing is even if they did, all you'd hear is how poorly UT coached and/or played and no one would recognize that they can play a littlle.
They're big, strong, experienced and disciplined. They have a good QB (Tennessee kid) and they're pretty well coached. They recruit Iowa kids. They do it right. I hope they win tomorrow.
Iowa is better than many are giving them credit. On any given Saturday, they'd beat a bunch of teams in the SEC. They're certainly capable of beating Tennessee, and the sad thing is even if they did, all you'd hear is how poorly UT coached and/or played and no one would recognize that they can play a littlle.
They're big, strong, experienced and disciplined. They have a good QB (Tennessee kid) and they're pretty well coached. They recruit Iowa kids. They do it right. I hope they win tomorrow.
That quote is true in the NFL. I see your point regarding CFB.Recruited talent predicts wins at an alarming rate. There are 6 SEC teams that recruit in the top 10. I believe there are 11 in the top 20, and all 14 in the top 40. The B1G has 2 teams in the top 20. None of them are Iowa, nor did Iowa play them. In fact, based on these numbers (if memory serves), if Iowa was in the SEC they would be the least talented team, and it wouldn't be close.
The odds that Iowa would even have a winning record if they swapped schedules with virtually any SEC team is extremely, prohibitively, low. What you're seeing with Iowa is a what I call the Utah State effect (fans ignore the weight of talent on wins and get too wrapped up in a mid tier talent team who has a schedule made up of typically lessor talented teams). The most misleading quote ever applied to CFB is that "you are what your record says you are". Nope. Not even close.