OldRollTide
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2011
- Messages
- 722
- Likes
- 212
Since rematches aren't all that common in college football, it didn't take long to look up.
Here are the conference title game rematches for all Power 5 conferences, including the defunct Big XII game.
SEC: Regular season winner is 5-1
Big Ten: 0-2
Pac 12: 3-1
ACC: 2-2
Big XII: 4-2
Combined, the regular season winner is 14-8.
EDIT to increase the sample size:
There has been one rematch in the MWC title game, and it was won by the regular season winner.
In the MAC Championship Game, the regular season winner is 3-2 in rematches.
So the overall record for all conference title game rematches is 18-10 in favor of the regular season winner.
It's actually not preposterous. They beat us by 39 AT HOME. So, arguably, that is much tougher to do than on a neutral site. And realistically, the only defensive players that would possibly be back in time for ATL would be Kirkland, McDowell, and Sutton as far as defense. O'Brien is gone, JRM and Sapp are out for the season, KMac is gone for the season.
I'm just saying you all are trying to argue that Tennessee is one of the 4 best teams in the country, which is supposed to be what the CFB Playoffs is indicative of. The SEC could just straight up miss the playoffs altogether something you all fail to grasp.
An 11-2 TN, even with a monumental upset, is not guaranteed to be in and probably shouldn't be in. I just do not see us being one of the 4 best teams in the country after what I have seen the past 2 weeks, but that doesn't mean we still aren't having a good season or potentially a great season
EDIT: Also, even with injuries a 39 point blowout loss at home is still a terrible mark on a resume. I don't see the committee being as forgiving as you all think they would be.
You are just being a homer with this comment. As of right now, all of these teams stand a strong chance of losing to both OSU and Michigan on a neutral site. Ole Miss couldn't even beat Arkansas or FSU, and we all watched FSU get boatraced by Lousiville.
Contrary to popular belief on this board, there is great football to be found outside the SEC, and that's OK. It's honestly better for the entire sport. Do we really need 4 terrible conferences and 1 good conference?
Dude, UT dropped 6 spots (AP) after WINNING ball games this year. If bama gets beat by "lucky and injured" UT, they are out of the top 4
After getting crushed at home by 39 points, the Vols don't deserve a playoff opportunity.
Exactly. And injuries is one of them.
The playoff committee would know we were missing nearly half of our starters in the October match-up with Alabama. If we beat Alabama in a rematch in Atlanta it would support the argument that injuries were the main reason for the blowout loss not a disparity in ability.
I'll just put it this way. I would rather be the 11-2 SEC Champ than the 12-1 non-SEC Champ that Saturday if I want to make the playoffs.
I just crunched the numbers. Alabama is winning by an average of 30 points per game. Assuming that average holds and they are 12-0 heading into Atlanta....
There is no way a loss by a fg to Tennessee would knock Bama out and put Tennessee in.
I don't see how that would be possible