RDU VOL#14
I’m a Flawed Character
- Joined
- Sep 11, 2007
- Messages
- 27,244
- Likes
- 41,022
SEC has only 3 AAU schools, Texas A&M, Florida and VandyCardale Jones disagrees
View attachment 418096
Be careful with the lower your standards statement. I've already stated a lot of UT fans and posters here are perfectly fine with MORAL victories against the big 3 and I have been scrutinized tremendously for it. But to answer your question there would be plenty of people here be just fine moving to a different conference. It's a hell no for me.
Cardale Jones disagrees
View attachment 418096
There are a ton of good schools in the B1G. I’m sure Harbaugh will tell us all about in the next few weeks. . I’m just saying that the B1G likes to throw the AAU stuff around, but it’s not like they’re turning guys away left and right because of their academic standards.SEC has only 3 AAU schools, Texas A&M, Florida and Vandy
I don’t hate on him getting his degree at all. Good for him . I think his tweet makes you wonder how difficult it was to earn his degree . UNC was another great AAU school pumping out degrees through its Afro-American Studies program.So he ate crow and came back to get his degree?
I can’t hate on a man getting an education.
You should read some of the game threads....Get over yourself. No one is ever happy with losing but they can but they can put it in context of where the program vs the state of the opponent’s program and be happy about the progress being made. That doesn’t mean they are celebrating “moral victories”.
We had enough depth to get our SIGNATURE Kentucky win but not a s__t Florida team? You guys play the depth card all too much. Depth to stick with Bama for 3 full quarters, but not a s___t Florida team? You guys basically call the players scrubs everyday.I’m just curious to what rock have you’ve been hiding under? Where have you been and not understand what has transpired in the last year? Yes it was all about depth issues and new systems and (AT) Florida ! Everything was completely NEW ! You name it everything NEW ! Do you expect a team to gel as if they’ve been in the system for years.? I agree there’s somethings on decision making...in my opinion that needs rethinking.
I remember plenty of people saying Pitt wasn’t a good team. Turns out they aren’t so bad. We still should’ve won.
Cardale Jones disagrees
View attachment 418096
Kentucky will always be beneath tennessee in football and with better play calling in the pitt game it would have been a win.Kentucky went 9-3, that's not your Daddy's UK team. Too many people live off past perceptions of teams rather than look at the match ups in games between the current players & coaches. People were counting Pitt as an easy win too, they supposedly sucked because of the name on their jerseys. No doubt some younger players and CFB fans who weren't alive to see the Fulmer years think UT is an also ran as well. Things change. We took a step in the right direction this year. Anyone who can't see that is blind.
Maybe we win if Hooker starts. Remember he only missed about a quarter and a half and he made some of those mistakes we made too. I tend to agree we likely win but it isn’t a guarantee. And yes Heupel started with Milton but if Milton hit those deep balls in games then Hooker never sees the field. Word is that Milton hit them in practice so I think it speaks well of Heupel that he adjusted so quickly given Hooker played from mid-way through the second game through the rest of the year.Regardless of them managing to make it to the ACC championship in a very weak division and win, they played us very poorly. Had we prepared and started Hooker, we'd have won that game handily.
That loss is on Heupel's desire for Milton to be a better QB than he actually is.
Exa
Exactly. But some people here are satisfied with mediocrity. I never in my lifetime thought I would see the day that beating Kentucky in a game of football was the mark of a good season. But most people on here strongly disagree with me. My argument is no matter how you spin it a 25 point loss is still a 25 point loss no matter if it came over the course of 4 quarters or in the 4th quarter alone.
Exactly. But some people here are satisfied with mediocrity. I never in my lifetime thought I would see the day that beating Kentucky in a game of football was the mark of a good season. But most people on here strongly disagree with me. My argument is no matter how you spin it a 25 point loss is still a 25 point loss no matter if it came over the course of 4 quarters or in the 4th quarter alone.
A lot of people in here don't remember anything before the last part of the 90's. Some of us remember the 70's and 80's. It was never as bad as it got with Gump and Lyle, but it was bad. I'd rather lose a few times to top teams, because when it does come back around -- and it will come back around -- it will be a wonder to behold.
//End ridiculously optimistic rant//