Causing turnovers erases anything they did offensively in the 1st half. Pat them on the back all you want, but that amazing USCe offense spotted UT 21 points.
I don't know that the SC offense spotted UT 21 points. The turnover helped, but only 1 UT drive was a gimme. Despite the first possession, which was a 3-and-out, the Vols moved the ball very well in the first half.
UT's first half possessions:
1) 2 yds, punt
2) 46 yds, punt
3) 2 yds, TD
4) 44 yds, TD
5) 72 yds, TD
6) 59 yds, missed FG
As bad as the Vols looked in the 2nd half, they were imho dominant in the first half. I thought the Vols were on their way to applying another whipping like the GA game. And, if the offense puts any drives together in the 2nd half, there is no way that SC could have come back from such a large halftime deficit.
and wound up with over 500 yards offense by game's end, so what's your point? call it what it is.Prior that meaningless 19-yard run on the last play of the first half, SC only had 127 yards of total offense.
and wound up with over 500 yards offense by game's end, so what's your point? call it what it is.
if not for divine intervention we'd all be a lot more pissed off.
spin, spin, spin..........
SC has a terrible offense, I think 110th in Div 1. The defense played ok. SC has a good defense though, and shut UT's offense out in the 2nd half. It was good to get a win. Just very surprising to see a Spurrier coached team, with such a lethargic offense.
85th in total offense. The 24 points was 1-point below SC's season average. As bad as they looked against Vandy, SC still scored 38 points in back-to-back wins over Miss State and Kentucky. SC appears to be as up and down on offense as the Vols are on defense.