Fullfillmer
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2009
- Messages
- 4,075
- Likes
- 3,664
Have to agree with Huey failing a little more substance to some of the arguements here.
What it did do was allow more reps for the other receivers which would help a little. I agree that a healthy Moore and Jones helped the consistency of the receivers. It has more to do with the coaching and adjustments made by the coaches and Crompton than anything that had to do with Warren in my opinon. It may have gotten a few peoples attention, but the whole arguement isn't even logical. They simplified Cromton's reads, he got more comfortable, he got deeper in the pocket or rolled out, was limited to focusing on half the field, etc.
None of this has anything to do with Warren being on the team or off the team. News flash, Crompdady's terrible first half and greatly improved second half against Auburn had nothing to do with Warren. I couldn't even tell you if Warren was still on the team then but I can tell you the offenses performance that game had nothing to do with him. Just my opinion. FEAR THE ORANGE.
What it did do was allow more reps for the other receivers which would help a little. I agree that a healthy Moore and Jones helped the consistency of the receivers. It has more to do with the coaching and adjustments made by the coaches and Crompton than anything that had to do with Warren in my opinon. It may have gotten a few peoples attention, but the whole arguement isn't even logical. They simplified Cromton's reads, he got more comfortable, he got deeper in the pocket or rolled out, was limited to focusing on half the field, etc.
None of this has anything to do with Warren being on the team or off the team. News flash, Crompdady's terrible first half and greatly improved second half against Auburn had nothing to do with Warren. I couldn't even tell you if Warren was still on the team then but I can tell you the offenses performance that game had nothing to do with him. Just my opinion. FEAR THE ORANGE.