JohnWardForever
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2008
- Messages
- 13,550
- Likes
- 11,411
Yes. One player who played about 5 plays a game being gone is not the reason we are doing good offensively. What is with all the stupid wild theories on here. We are playing good because we have a QB who's finally playing with confidence and we played one of the worst teams in the country yesterday which is going to help. We will continue to be good offensively but to think one guy who could barely get on the field all year was somehow holding our whole offense back is just stupid.No secret that Warren thought Stephens was the better QB, and let his feelings be known. Since Warren left, the offense has been close to---if not--great. Coincidence?
Yes. One player who played about 5 plays a game being gone is not the reason we are doing good offensively. What is with all the stupid wild theories on here. We are playing good because we have a QB who's finally playing with confidence and we played one of the worst teams in the country yesterday which is going to help. We will continue to be good offensively but to think one guy who could barely get on the field all year was somehow holding our whole offense back is just stupid.
I don't speculate on crap I dont know about. No one on the team wanted to see Stephens play at this point in the year because no one likes Nick Stephens. Sorry, its the truth. Warren was never a thorn to the rest of the team, he just was lazy and therefore cut. If our receivers cant perform because a lazy waste of talent that they are ahead of is somehow keeping all of them from playing well, then they should follow him out the door. Our receivers being lights out has a whole lot to do with scheming and finally getting into a groove and nothing with being minus one lazy receiver. Know you stuff before you call someone else stupid.I think you might be a little stupid. Nothing rips up a locker room like a QB controversy especially when half the team supports one guy vs. the other. Luckily it didn't get to that point and we got rid of the cancer before it spread. Think before u post, Huey.
Yes. One player who played about 5 plays a game being gone is not the reason we are doing good offensively. What is with all the stupid wild theories on here. We are playing good because we have a QB who's finally playing with confidence and we played one of the worst teams in the country yesterday which is going to help. We will continue to be good offensively but to think one guy who could barely get on the field all year was somehow holding our whole offense back is just stupid.
Source? Where is this common knowledge? Are we bringing up stuff from last season? I'm not saying Warren didn't cause problems but if you think the reason our receivers are playing good is because Brandon Warren is gone than that's just stupid. So is this how it went:Warren made no secrets that he wanted Stephens instead of Crompton. He wouldn't play with Crompton and tried to get ALL the receivers to side with him, very childish I know but true. Part of the reason receivers werent getting open was bc of this and he almost turned GJ on this as well. Sorry if this isn't common knowledge.
Warren made no secrets that he wanted Stephens instead of Crompton. He wouldn't play with Crompton and tried to get ALL the receivers to side with him, very childish I know but true. Part of the reason receivers werent getting open was bc of this and he almost turned GJ on this as well. Sorry if this isn't common knowledge.
Source? Where is this common knowledge? Are we bringing up stuff from last season? I'm not saying Warren didn't cause problems but if you think the reason our receivers are playing good is because Brandon Warren is gone than that's just stupid. So is this how it went:
Gerald Jones goes out for a pass, drops it, and dammit that Brandon Warren character made him do it.
I don't speculate on crap I dont know about. No one on the team wanted to see Stephens play at this point in the year because no one likes Nick Stephens. Sorry, its the truth. Warren was never a thorn to the rest of the team, he just was lazy and therefore cut. If our receivers cant perform because a lazy waste of talent that they are ahead of is somehow keeping all of them from playing well, then they should follow him out the door. Our receivers being lights out has a whole lot to do with scheming and finally getting into a groove and nothing with being minus one lazy receiver. Know you stuff before you call someone else stupid.
Edit:
By the way where the h*ll is this QB controversy that I somehow missed? Stephens has played like crap all year in practice, there was no controversy.
Someone who goes by the username Urinal Mint is calling others stupid. :shakehead:Yes. One player who played about 5 plays a game being gone is not the reason we are doing good offensively. What is with all the stupid wild theories on here. We are playing good because we have a QB who's finally playing with confidence and we played one of the worst teams in the country yesterday which is going to help. We will continue to be good offensively but to think one guy who could barely get on the field all year was somehow holding our whole offense back is just stupid.