Coach J, yes they see talent but remember that the next level after College is normally based on potential. For Basha, even though she has been poorly coached here, she will get better through the maturation process, and she will have a little more freedom than with CHW and she will be forced to get better because the competition at that level is so much better. If not, it's Europe or a job.
But the problem here is beyond the recruiting IMHO. You still have to coach. Talent without coaching works in the rec and Church leagues but not in D-1 or Pro Ball.
+++
it doesn't even work with UPWARDS BB!
I believe they have a good staff. What I firmly believe and cannot be diswayed about is that when they lost Pat Summit, they lost a head coach, that part was replaced. But they lost two other aspects that no one on this staff has shown me their capable of:
1) They lost the emotional leader. The Alpha coach. The coach that all of these supremely talented kids, paled in comparison to... When you coach a girl and she feels she is on your level, that is ok for certain types of player-personalities. You can be the "friend coach" and everything's' just marvy... But when it is a female alpha-athlete, they will only respect the desires and leadership of someone they feel is in some way superior to them. Someone who can knock them off their lofty perch, or, that same person can lift them out of the lowest of lows. . . .If you've never coached such an player, this is not something you can understand. Does the Alpha-influence have to lead. Nope. I have been told my entire tenure in coach, "Good leaders make great followers".
These girls come in here thinking they have learned everything the game of basketball can teach them. Heck, I have had middle-schoolers with that same facade.... All I had to do was show them one drill they couldn't immediately master, or had never seen, and I had a student that was immediately submissive. This is what prompted me to create my new methods and drills.
For instance the fast-break drill.
The 16U team I posted was full of dominant players. Only two were girly-girls. The rest were a handful! So I had to establish leadership immediately by showing them I knew more than they did.
-First I timed each girl to find the fastest one on dribble.
-Then I put five girls in the arc and told them to try to beat the dribbler down the court without ever dribbling the ball (They had no chance at this... I let them fail over and over).
-Then I set-up the fast-break and taught the girls how to run it.
-They beat the dribbler nearly every time. (Bad passing decisions factored into the losses)
-with each loss to the dribble I would point out where the loss happened. e.g. ( A player would pivot away from the angle and pass while moving backwards, instead of into the pass).
-With each turn it got better. Once we were proficient with mechanics of the FB, we started trying to beat our times.
I needed this team to follow me. They wouldn't do so, unless I proved worthy. And if that scares you, as a coach, get a new hobby!
2) With Pat they lost the "larger than life" influence. The one no one could stand toe to toe with. I met Pat during the 1996-97 SEC women's tournament in Chattanooga, at UTC (I still have the media guide to this day) . Part of my internship was to work the SEC women's tourney. That was many years ago, but I still remember how in awe I was of her. She was not normal, she was extra-ordinary. Self-assured, dominant and famous. ... AS full of myself as I could ever be, I still knew this I was not on par with this woman. She was larger than life. ... By being so, she took all of the pressure and focus off of her charges. So they were able to simply play the game.
That's what is missing now. A personality so bold, that it takes the focus off of the girls.