If both qb's are equal, would Butch start the more experienced or the one who would give you 4 years ? He has leaned toward the experience factory in the past.
in fairness, when he did that, it was in year 1 and 2, and not having anyone else on the depth chart behind peterman or worley, except dobbs. in his effort to plan on the future, i think he wanted to see if he could get thru the first year with Nate and Justin, and keep Dobbs on the shelf so he'd have 4 years left of elgibility. then they had to burn it. tried it again the next year, and he wound up having to start the rest of that season too. had he been able to use the red shirt on Dobbs, he'd be eligible to play this year.
and we didn't know, at the time, that we'd have a QD or JG on the roster at this point, so it worked out, in theory.
If all things are equal, common sense says the start the younger player.
not always, depending on the bigger picture, it may make more sense to see if you can squeeze another year by red shirting the younger guy. like we tried to do with Dobbs, and that we did do with JG.
the situation is different headed in to this season than it was in 13 and 14, so there's no need to go further down the depth chart looking for the "future". so it affords the opportunity to put these two guys in a competitive situation and see which one comes out on top.
the only way we lose, long term, is if neither guy gets it, and no one comes out clearly ahead.
i am of the mindset that if they both come out on truly equal footing, then neither of them probably did much, or enough, to separate. i doubt the notion that both are superstars right now, and they simply can't make a decision on which one....and it's a "can't lose either way" situation. if that's the case, then i definitely think they go with experience, slight as it may be, and give JG more time to develop. that's worst case scenario btw, not what i think will eventually happen.