Vols Practice Article

#51
#51
I don't know about Coker's off-the-field problems, but if he's not violating any team rules going into the season then he has to be our #1 back. He is the only guy in the backfield who gives us a playmaker who can score on any given play. That gives our offense a dynamic it hasn't had in a while and if he's not on the field then our offense is very different.
 
#52
#52
Coker is small and misses his cuts, I feel better if he was like an H-back or something and Arian 'The Beast' Foster was our TB.
 
#53
#53
Football Freak said:
Coker is small and misses his cuts, I feel better if he was like an H-back or something and Arian 'The Beast' Foster was our TB.
Click to expand...

Lamarcus Coker is not suited to play H-back. Why would you ask a 200 lb guy to play a position that involves a lot of lead blocking and pass protection?
 
#54
#54
Not like a fullback-h-back, kinda like a recieving lineman? i dunno, but he will never play a down in the NFL.
 
#56
#56
Football Freak said:
Not like a fullback-h-back, kinda like a recieving lineman? i dunno, but he will never play a down in the NFL.
Click to expand...

So now we're putting the 200 lb guy at the line of scrimmage? If you don't know what an H-back is, it's OK, just stop making authoritative statements as if you are some kind of expert.
 
#59
#59
Holbert is an H-back at 240 lbs. I was talking about put Coker somewhere out there, just not at runningbacks, like do some screens and reverses.
 
#63
#63
"to be a teacher you must first decide to always be a student"
 
#67
#67
Anyone else see that Lincoln out preformed Colquitt in kicking??! :ermm:
 
#68
#68
Yep but Colquitt is a punter filling in on the kicking I thought so that shouldn't be a big deal.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement



Back
Top