butchna
Sit down and tell me all about it...way over there
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2013
- Messages
- 103,088
- Likes
- 206,805
I've been arguing that point the entire time. I live in GA, so I have had the chance to watch the kid a few times. He played in an uptempo offense in high school, and broke records in one of the toughest classifications in the country. The kid can absolutely play in this system. Just give him time to develope bc all the other QB's have been in college longer then he has and have actually had real offseason programs.Bailey taking first reps certainly throws a wrench in the narrative that some were pushing. Maybe rumors of him being a bust or a bad fit were a little premature.
He has been spinning all spring. When it began to look like HB was 3rd, he began to beat the drum that none of them are any good. Him saying they all looked the same... probably means Maurer did look better. I've started to pick up on just some subtle but very consistent ways he's reporting.Pretty much said all the QBs looked the same but all looked sharp.
I can see Hooker taking the job for sure. That's the safe pick.He has been spinning all spring. When it began to look like HB was 3rd, he began to beat the drum that none of them are any good. Him saying they all looked the same... probably means Maurer did look better. I've started to pick up on just some subtle but very consistent ways he's reporting.
I truly and honestly do not care who the starter is. I just want them to play well and score lots of points. Maurer gets picked on a lot and most of the divisions seem to fall along the Maurer vs HB lines... but IMHO I think the forgotten man may still be the guy who ends up with the job- Hooker.
Price said Maurer was the most accurate today...followed by Hooker.He has been spinning all spring. When it began to look like HB was 3rd, he began to beat the drum that none of them are any good. Him saying they all looked the same... probably means Maurer did look better. I've started to pick up on just some subtle but very consistent ways he's reporting.
I truly and honestly do not care who the starter is. I just want them to play well and score lots of points. Maurer gets picked on a lot and most of the divisions seem to fall along the Maurer vs HB lines... but IMHO I think the forgotten man may still be the guy who ends up with the job- Hooker.
He didn't do much at VT, he is not going to do much for us except for a few broken plays.I can see Hooker taking the job for sure. That's the safe pick.
Kinda makes me think of Jeremy Pruitt with the safe pick...
I think he's the QB Pruitt wished JG was.
I have to think Heup may not want to sacrifice some aggression for safety though. He may prefer to have someone push the ball down the field more regardless of risk. I don't think Hooker ever really aired it out at VT. One of my best friends is a huge VT fan, watches every game and he has no idea if Hooker can push the ball down the field.
I could see Hooker getting the start and later on getting supplanted by someone who can move the ball down the field at a more explosive rate.
You have to imagine against some of the big boys on our schedule we will find it very difficult to run the ball and if we aren't running the ball too well we need the ability to connect on passes down field.
Anyone who actually watched Bailey play last year could see he was miles ahead of the rest of our QBs including Maurer. Wasn’t likely he would suddenly cease looking like the five-star surrounded by three-starsBailey taking first reps certainly throws a wrench in the narrative that some were pushing. Maybe rumors of him being a bust or a bad fit were a little premature.