Vols non-conference schedule

#1

wmcovol

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2012
Messages
18,931
Likes
34,511
#1
Is very weak this year. Was 2024 & 2025 the years Tennessee was supposed to be playing Oklahoma? I remember 2023 was the year Vols were to go to BYU & they played Va instead

If you add OU in the non conference, this schedule wouldnt be so weak along with 8 other SEC games.
 
#2
#2
Honestly, I don't even mind it. The SEC is murderer's row every year and although I'm lukewarm at best on many of Herbie's takes, I remember him saying last year that power conference schools were going to end up scheduling fluffy non-conference games because in the end it doesn't matter when you play stiff in-conference competition. It's not like the BCS era where a win over a big out of conference opponent is really considered. OSU, Oregon, Texas and most other playoff teams last year had garbage out of conference games as well. Basically, its kinda like why take the risk when your conference slate is difficult enough.
 
#3
#3
The largest reason we made the playoffs last year was out schedule and, to some degree, when we caught a couple of the teams. Had we had Oklahoma at the end instead of the beginning, the W/L ratio may have been different.
 
#4
#4
The largest reason we made the playoffs last year was out schedule and, to some degree, when we caught a couple of the teams. Had we had Oklahoma at the end instead of the beginning, the W/L ratio may have been different.
What are you talking about?

We beat them on their home field. A mucked up field mind you. Stop talking nonsense all the time.
 
#10
#10
Spurrier made a career off of playing ridiculously weak non-conference schedules. While we would be playing teams like Notre Dame, UCLA, and Miami, he'd be playing Rice and Tulane and running up the score sky high on them.
They played FSU every year when they were very good. That gets overlooked.
 
#11
#11
The largest reason we made the playoffs last year was out schedule and, to some degree, when we caught a couple of the teams. Had we had Oklahoma at the end instead of the beginning, the W/L ratio may have been different.
Other than Alabama (Milroe was completely horrible that night), when did OU look good late last year? LSU beat them pretty good, SC embarrassed them at home.
 
  • Like
Reactions: orangebloodgmc
#14
#14
OP, you say "non conference schedule is weak" as if it varies wildly from year to year. It really doesn't.

It's always three powder puffs (usually 2 G5, 1 FCS) plus one FBS peer that might or might not be a challenge. Some years, that;'s an Oregon. Sometimes, it's a Virginia.

Either way, it's just a single game. The bulk of the OOC schedule is about amassing wins. Every year.

Go Vols!
 
  • Like
Reactions: tbwhhs
#15
#15
Spurrier made a career off of playing ridiculously weak non-conference schedules. While we would be playing teams like Notre Dame, UCLA, and Miami, he'd be playing Rice and Tulane and running up the score sky high on them.
He played FLSt every season. 14 times, twice in 1995. FLSt was in the Top 10 every time they played while Spurrier was HC, except 2001. Seminoles were Top 3 6x. Ranked #1 in two of the games.
He had 1 landmine in his schedule every year.

Pretty amazing to have his coaching record at UF when he played a full SEC slate and FLSt every year. Spurrier was 5-8 vs Bowden.
 
#16
#16
We pretty much have adopted the scheduling practices of our SEC East rivals, with the exception of the Gators, who have recently lost their mind. We’ve scheduled an ACC team just like those teams who have a set rivalry game vs an ACC team like UK, UGA, UF and USCjr. Next year we get GT bc Nebraska wussed out.
 
#17
#17
What are you talking about?

We beat them on their home field. A mucked up field mind you. Stop talking nonsense all the time.
Let me just remind that one of the most truthful posts of the year was made by an OU fan after that game.

"That was the worst 10 point beatdown that I have ever seen in college football"
 
#18
#18
Spurrier made a career off of playing ridiculously weak non-conference schedules. While we would be playing teams like Notre Dame, UCLA, and Miami, he'd be playing Rice and Tulane and running up the score sky high on them.
Spurrier played Florida State every year when they were a perennial top 5 team and Clemson every year at South Carolina. Saying he played ridiculously weak nonconference schedules just because their toughest nonconference game was at the end of the year is a foolish thing to say.
 
#20
#20
Yeah, we lost OOC games vs OK and Nebraska which aren't easy games to replace on short notice. Not knowing when we will go to a 9 game Conference schedule hurts scheduling as well.
 
#21
#21
OP, you say "non conference schedule is weak" as if it varies wildly from year to year. It really doesn't.

It's always three powder puffs (usually 2 G5, 1 FCS) plus one FBS peer that might or might not be a challenge. Some years, that;'s an Oregon. Sometimes, it's a Virginia.

Either way, it's just a single game. The bulk of the OOC schedule is about amassing wins. Every year.

Go Vols!
Tend to agree. The last ā€œbig-timeā€ OOC opponent was Oklahoma in ā€˜14 & ā€˜15. Since then it was:

VA Tech
GT
WVU
BYU
Pitt x 2
UVA
NC State

Pretty ā€œmeh!ā€
 
#24
#24
Spurrier made a career off of playing ridiculously weak non-conference schedules. While we would be playing teams like Notre Dame, UCLA, and Miami, he'd be playing Rice and Tulane and running up the score sky high on them.

Spurrier beat the living daylights out of everyone not named Nebraska. During that era it was Osborne then Spurrier. I hated his guts and still do to an extent but he hung most of our 90s losses on us. Him and Osbourne.
 

VN Store



Back
Top