Volman365's Takeaways From Game

#127
#127
MoodyVol said:
You specifically called out narrow shoulders and hips. Peyton may be the most narrow QB I can recall.
You left out Brees and Flutie, as well
Click to expand...
Brees has the football acumen to get the ball out and on time while doing it downfield and accurate. Flutie was an athlete playing qb, scrambler, run around and avoid being hit, JG is NOT a runner
 
#129
#129
Volman365 said:
Brees has the football acumen to get the ball out and on time while doing it downfield and accurate. Flutie was an athlete playing qb, scrambler, run around and avoid being hit, JG is NOT a runner
Click to expand...


Brees has been sacked 387 times in his NFL career, including 37 sacks in one season and 25+ in multiple seasons.

And you still haven’t addressed your “narrow shoulders and hips” theory. Citing Peyton’s height and weight does not address in the least. The dude is still narrow. He didn’t have the moniker “stick boy” for nothing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BloomuVol
#130
#130
MoodyVol said:
Brees has been sacked 387 times in his NFL career, including 37 sacks in one season and 25+ in multiple seasons.

And you still haven’t addressed your “narrow shoulders and hips” theory. Citing Peyton’s height and weight does not address in the least. The dude is still narrow. He didn’t have the moniker “stick boy” for nothing.
Click to expand...
He never got hit once in his career like JG has been hit 20 times. He knew where blitzes were coming from and got rid of the ball this didnt need to be physiologically superior.
 
#131
#131
Volman365 said:
He never got hit once in his career like JG has been hit 20 times. He knew where blitzes were coming from and got rid of the ball this didnt need to be physiologically superior.
Click to expand...


Thank you for debunking your physiological claim.
 
#133
#133
Volman365 said:
But I am referring to someone who allows themselves to be hit a million times due ti their lack if football IQ. None of the ones you listed apply at ALL
Click to expand...

I can get on board with that line of thinking even if I don’t agree with it. It has less to do with stature and more to do with being hit multiple times.
 
#135
#135
OrangeByBirth said:
volmaniac365 is working on building post count. Nothing of value has been presented in this entire thread except to defend the stupid concepts put forth to clamor for Chryst.
Click to expand...


Didn’t even know that was a thing, thanks for the heads up, I’m out of this one!
 
#137
#137
Volman365 said:
Wrong sir, why would a grown man care about "post count"??
Click to expand...
I have no clue about how grown you might be "physiologically" but know that you are not fully developed mentally. And as to why … perhaps you can explain how you've been a member for barely over a month and have passed the previous poster to whom I replied that has been a member for over 5 years. Now, why DO you care?
 
  • Like
Reactions: BloomuVol
#138
#138
OrangeByBirth said:
I have no clue about how grown you might be "physiologically" but know that you are not fully developed mentally. And as to why … perhaps you can explain how you've been a member for barely over a month and have passed the previous poster to whom I replied that has been a member for over 5 years. Now, why DO you care?
Click to expand...
I have been a member of Volnation for 53 years.
 
#141
#141
Volman365 said:
1. Ty Chandler is a Heisman ability back but our staff is enamored with "spreading" the ball around to other backs throughout the game. It is very frustrating as he can and will be a stud in the league. Think Kamara on steroids.
2. 79 plays in a modern football game is not much for a defense to play. Its not ideal but definitely not a ridiculous number and not an excuse to give up 50.
3. From a pure physiological standpoint, KC is much better equipped to take the beating that our Oline allows our QBs to take.
4. We can and will beat Vandy if Ty is featured almost exclusively, the others are simply mop up type players.
5. There is NO way Missiouri has a night and day better roster of talent with the last 4 or 5 classes they have brought in, simply NO WAY.
6. We will win 10 next year if we play Shrout and feature Chandler.
Click to expand...

Just another reason to require a 1000 posts to start a thread, or a year to for a thread start...whichever comes later.
 
  • Like
Reactions: volfannbama and MoodyVol
#143
#143
Volman365 said:
Thanks bud!
Click to expand...
you are welcome.
you said flame away...
you address too much that at the moment is really not addressable
This will all play out in the future of which about 20% if any will stick to the wall....
Almost like a conspiracy theory....
We may have more talent, but leadership and teamwork is young.....not working together.
Freshman RS next year better be on a fast learning curve
Hidden agenda....
 
#144
#144
Sudden Impact said:
you are welcome.
you said flame away...
you address too much that at the moment is really not addressable
This will all play out in the future of which about 20% if any will stick to the wall....
Almost like a conspiracy theory....
We may have more talent, but leadership and teamwork is young.....not working together.
Freshman RS next year better be on a fast learning curve
Hidden agenda....
Click to expand...
Only agenda here is for us to start winning.[/QUOTE]
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top